Not fun for opponemt - GOOD, concede. If you can't take the heat, don't light a match ^^
Not fun for player - well, duh, opp hasn't conceded. Seriously, it's fun to see HLs squirm, but there's nothing better than a pure pally player conceding t5.
It's not very good - and still got more salt than DH, apparently it does its job very well.
Giant waste of time - well, if opp had conceded, we'd be on next game already. Now who's the time waster?
TBH, I still think it should've been nerfed to summon when drawn.
Can somebody tell me why whiners keep missing the salt thread and spamming the forum? Mods, at this point you might as well just delete the salth thread.
There are a ton of different play styles. Aggro player thinks Control decks are completely cancer, while Mid-Range players think that Aggro decks are completely cancer. Just think about Rock Paper and Scissor, if you remove Rock from the game, Paper will never win
Weasel Priest was one of my favorite decks of all time. It's just plain good fun. Adding things to the opponents deck is just a good way to spent time.
Why do you decide what's fun? I can't for my life have fun with an aggro deck and I can't in any way see what people like with aggro, but clearly people do like it and the same goes for Res Priest.
Interesting. I didn't play vs Albatross priest minimal last 150 games so I don't know... Maybe it's issue what rank you play. I use in legend some not standard deck for fun but during climbing to legend I play classic decks.
Do you decide what is fun and what is not in this game for everyone?
Like I said. The only reason for finding fun playing that deck is that you find enjoyment in others misery, in which case I´m very worried.
You said it, but it does not make it automatically true. Also the fact that you started calling everybody else kids right-away kind of tells how immature you are.
Do you decide what is fun and what is not in this game for everyone?
Like I said. The only reason for finding fun playing that deck is that you find enjoyment in others misery, in which case I´m very worried.
The more miserable and frustrated I can make my opponent, the better for me. I don't care if it's a turn 3 / 4 lethal with some aggro deck or a 20 turn misery fest with Res Priest. If my opponent is hating the game the chance is that I'm loving it.
Do you decide what is fun and what is not in this game for everyone?
Like I said. The only reason for finding fun playing that deck is that you find enjoyment in others misery, in which case I´m very worried.
The more miserable and frustrated I can make my opponent, the better for me. I don't care if it's a turn 3 / 4 lethal with some aggro deck or a 20 turn misery fest with Res Priest. If my opponent is hating the game the chance is that I'm loving it.
Let me tell you about a new class, DH. Just play that. It sounds perfect. No skill required. You go 1 drop into 4 drop into 5 drop which is supposed to be a 7 drop but isn't and you win the video game:)
There are counter options, but they are not equally available to all classes, some just don't fit in certain archetypes, and others are just bad. Pure pally, for instance, is pretty much just wrecked. But I wouldn't flat out say there are no counters, and I would also argue for a slow (post-nerf) card that aims to slow down the opponent in the long game (it's good against control but aggro doesn't aim to draw through most of its deck), there doesn't need to be a universal good counter for it. It doesn't warrant it. The issue lies with too much resurrection that multiplies the effect of the death rattle to a potentially problematic degree, so I say it's the priest res mechanic that needs countering or changing, not the albatross. There, we also deal with wild and the endless amounts of Convincing Infiltrator and Khartut Defenders.
I'm just playing along with this thread and looking at what the problem might be. Personally, I don't really care since it doesn't bother me too much. When I play highlander mage, I mulligan for polymorph or Zephrys into hex and try to avoid killing a turn 4 albatross if I can afford to wait. Also won against a res priest once despite them shuffling over 20 birds into my deck by being super greedy with my hand and always going for max value plays. When I play more tempo-based decks, I don't care about the birds. Basically I either have a plan to deal with it or don't care. Again, sorry pure pally. That deck is just hopeless in most matchups.
Let me tell you about a new class, DH. Just play that. It sounds perfect. No skill required. You go 1 drop into 4 drop into 5 drop which is supposed to be a 7 drop but isn't and you win the video game:)
Why do people play this bullshit deck?
Its not fun for the opponent.
Its not fun for the player.
Its not very good.
Its a giant waste of time.
The only reason I could see someone playing this is that they get enjoyment out of ruining the game and wasting their opponents time.
How screwed up in the head do you have to be?
Do you decide what is fun and what is not in this game for everyone?
cause this babyrage over a “mediocre deck” is funny
Lol you guys are so sad.
It really is time for me to get away from this bullshit community if this is what you kids consider "fun"
Not fun for opponemt - GOOD, concede. If you can't take the heat, don't light a match ^^
Not fun for player - well, duh, opp hasn't conceded. Seriously, it's fun to see HLs squirm, but there's nothing better than a pure pally player conceding t5.
It's not very good - and still got more salt than DH, apparently it does its job very well.
Giant waste of time - well, if opp had conceded, we'd be on next game already. Now who's the time waster?
TBH, I still think it should've been nerfed to summon when drawn.
Like I said. The only reason for finding fun playing that deck is that you find enjoyment in others misery, in which case I´m very worried.
Can somebody tell me why whiners keep missing the salt thread and spamming the forum? Mods, at this point you might as well just delete the salth thread.
To answer your question:
Not fun to me =/= fun in general
There are a ton of different play styles. Aggro player thinks Control decks are completely cancer, while Mid-Range players think that Aggro decks are completely cancer. Just think about Rock Paper and Scissor, if you remove Rock from the game, Paper will never win
Weasel Priest was one of my favorite decks of all time. It's just plain good fun. Adding things to the opponents deck is just a good way to spent time.
Ress priest is a million times more fun that murloc pala. That deck makes me sad.
Why do you decide what's fun? I can't for my life have fun with an aggro deck and I can't in any way see what people like with aggro, but clearly people do like it and the same goes for Res Priest.
- the oppressive comments here are too brutal, we need to respect the game community, at least by a certain degree ,(even the aggro players ..)
- Albatross is a problematic card and Blizzard already addressed this, it's destroying the concept of highlander and "pure" decks.
- Blizzard should at least provide some tech cards against the albatross effect, currently there is no counter options.
Interesting. I didn't play vs Albatross priest minimal last 150 games so I don't know... Maybe it's issue what rank you play. I use in legend some not standard deck for fun but during climbing to legend I play classic decks.
You said it, but it does not make it automatically true. Also the fact that you started calling everybody else kids right-away kind of tells how immature you are.
The more miserable and frustrated I can make my opponent, the better for me. I don't care if it's a turn 3 / 4 lethal with some aggro deck or a 20 turn misery fest with Res Priest. If my opponent is hating the game the chance is that I'm loving it.
Missing lethal since June 2015.
Let me tell you about a new class, DH. Just play that. It sounds perfect. No skill required. You go 1 drop into 4 drop into 5 drop which is supposed to be a 7 drop but isn't and you win the video game:)
Polymorph, Hex, in my zoo lock I run Magic Carpet and Rocket Augmerchant with Infectious Sporeling, I ran Tinkmaster Overspark in my highlander warrior lists for a while, a well-timedFlik Skyshiv can erase many birds from deck. Blackjack Stunner can be a good way to delay the birds in a deck that draws incredibly fast anyway and can afford a few dead draws.
There are counter options, but they are not equally available to all classes, some just don't fit in certain archetypes, and others are just bad. Pure pally, for instance, is pretty much just wrecked. But I wouldn't flat out say there are no counters, and I would also argue for a slow (post-nerf) card that aims to slow down the opponent in the long game (it's good against control but aggro doesn't aim to draw through most of its deck), there doesn't need to be a universal good counter for it. It doesn't warrant it. The issue lies with too much resurrection that multiplies the effect of the death rattle to a potentially problematic degree, so I say it's the priest res mechanic that needs countering or changing, not the albatross. There, we also deal with wild and the endless amounts of Convincing Infiltrator and Khartut Defenders.
I'm just playing along with this thread and looking at what the problem might be. Personally, I don't really care since it doesn't bother me too much. When I play highlander mage, I mulligan for polymorph or Zephrys into hex and try to avoid killing a turn 4 albatross if I can afford to wait. Also won against a res priest once despite them shuffling over 20 birds into my deck by being super greedy with my hand and always going for max value plays. When I play more tempo-based decks, I don't care about the birds. Basically I either have a plan to deal with it or don't care. Again, sorry pure pally. That deck is just hopeless in most matchups.
I knew this thread was about DH... Again...
Chill out it got nerf. And it’s an anti control deck.
VERY WELL SAID!