This is something I am very interested in testing once the expansion comes out, how about yall?
Both Trueheart and Eadric seem to be very greedy, thus if you wish you can end up swapping them for Belchers or overall staples, everything else seems to be just standard.
Too few 2s and too many 3s. No equality, so it'll be tough to actually "control" anything. Still, not a bad deck and of course I want more Dragon Pally. :]
I don't know about Nefarian over alex tho. Also maybe Enter the Coliseum is playable.
CA, also I think we can bring in the beats sometimes that we don't rly need alexs... and uh, like I said: CA. about ETC, I think that card is baaaaad D: , but maybe its playable, it does leaves a minion of ours alive after all... hummmm
Too few 2s and too many 3s. No equality, so it'll be tough to actually "control" anything. Still, not a bad deck and of course I want more Dragon Pally. :]
this is HS, so your minions are also removal, and if you outvalue your opponent in plays you might as well call your deck "control" because it goes "greedily" to the late game :P
Too few 2s and too many 3s. No equality, so it'll be tough to actually "control" anything. Still, not a bad deck and of course I want more Dragon Pally. :]
this is HS, so your minions are also removal, and if you outvalue your opponent in plays you might as well call your deck "control" because it goes "greedily" to the late game :P
I'm just saying that if you plan to stay alive with only 2 2 drops and 2 1 drops, you'll likely need some catch-up cards. Without equality there are some really tough matchups to come back from. Playing a lot of dragon pally, tempo or comeback cards are your only way to get to the late game easily.
CA, also I think we can bring in the beats sometimes that we don't rly need alexs... and uh, like I said: CA. about ETC, I think that card is baaaaad D: , but maybe its playable, it does leaves a minion of ours alive after all... hummmm
You need equality. and Enter the Coliseum has synergy with aldor also is strong with the game plan. I believe it would be played over brawl in control warrior.
CA, also I think we can bring in the beats sometimes that we don't rly need alexs... and uh, like I said: CA. about ETC, I think that card is baaaaad D: , but maybe its playable, it does leaves a minion of ours alive after all... hummmm
You need equality. and Enter the Coliseum has synergy with aldor also is strong with the game plan. I believe it would be played over brawl in control warrior.
chillmaw >>
you only want sweepers of this quality versus patron and aggro (zoos?)... so chillmaw is better
It feels weird to play a really slow paladin without equality but tell us if you do well like this. Also i don't really like Justicar without any sinergy, for me the card doens't fell broken to be used like that. If you wanna try new cards i would use a Kodorider or a Master Jouster instead depending if you face more aggro or control.
you only want sweepers of this quality versus patron and aggro (zoos?)... so chillmaw is better
No no. Equality is better Vs handlock and Druid. The 2x Equality is the reason why Paladin is favored against those decks. They are so prevalent also through the history of hearthstone, I couldn't see not running them in any near future. I played Midrange and control paladin a lot.
you only want sweepers of this quality versus patron and aggro (zoos?)... so chillmaw is better
No no. Equality is better Vs handlock and Druid. The 2x Equality is the reason why Paladin is favored against those decks. They are so prevalent also through the history of hearthstone, I couldn't see not running them in any near future. I played Midrange and control paladin a lot.
So did strifecro and he hates the card D: been running zero of them for some time now too, not much problem with it.
and uhhh, I wouldn't change my deck thinking about the Handlock matchup, plus Eadric actually makes up against Handlock for the Equality loss (without even requiring an activator like equality does)
you only want sweepers of this quality versus patron and aggro (zoos?)... so chillmaw is better
No no. Equality is better Vs handlock and Druid. The 2x Equality is the reason why Paladin is favored against those decks. They are so prevalent also through the history of hearthstone, I couldn't see not running them in any near future. I played Midrange and control paladin a lot.
So did strifecro and he hates the card D: been running zero of them for some time now too, not much problem with it.
and uhhh, I wouldn't change my deck thinking about the Handlock matchup, plus Eadric actually makes up against Handlock for the Equality loss (without even requiring an activator like equality does)
Mid range paladin puts more pressure on the opponent though.
I wonder if it wouldn't be worth exchanging the two Zombie Chow for Argent Lance, especially in a control deck where you have a lot of high cost minions.
I'm also a personal fan of Argent Lance, but I don't think I can convince anyone to get on board with it.
I agree, I had some success playing Muster even with Quartermaster in my deck, but I feel like it's holding back the deck and also gets wreckt in too man situations nowadays. I did run only one Quartermaster but even with two, it's difficult to get too much use out of it.
I hate running Muster without Quartermaster and I hate playing Paladin without Quartermaster because the hero power seems really weak otherwise. But for now, I'll try this variant without either (I wonder if Seal of Light is worth considering with the Lance, or Blessing of Kings/Seal of Champions with EtC):
Feel teh powah
This is something I am very interested in testing once the expansion comes out, how about yall?
Both Trueheart and Eadric seem to be very greedy, thus if you wish you can end up swapping them for Belchers or overall staples, everything else seems to be just standard.
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
Finally, someone is smart.
I don't know about Nefarian over alex tho. Also maybe Enter the Coliseum is playable.
Too few 2s and too many 3s. No equality, so it'll be tough to actually "control" anything. Still, not a bad deck and of course I want more Dragon Pally. :]
CA, also I think we can bring in the beats sometimes that we don't rly need alexs... and uh, like I said: CA.
about ETC, I think that card is baaaaad D: , but maybe its playable, it does leaves a minion of ours alive after all... hummmm
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
this is HS, so your minions are also removal, and if you outvalue your opponent in plays you might as well call your deck "control" because it goes "greedily" to the late game :P
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
I'm just saying that if you plan to stay alive with only 2 2 drops and 2 1 drops, you'll likely need some catch-up cards. Without equality there are some really tough matchups to come back from. Playing a lot of dragon pally, tempo or comeback cards are your only way to get to the late game easily.
You need equality. and Enter the Coliseum has synergy with aldor also is strong with the game plan. I believe it would be played over brawl in control warrior.
chillmaw >>
you only want sweepers of this quality versus patron and aggro (zoos?)... so chillmaw is better
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
AT LEAST IN THEORY!!!
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
It feels weird to play a really slow paladin without equality but tell us if you do well like this. Also i don't really like Justicar without any sinergy, for me the card doens't fell broken to be used like that. If you wanna try new cards i would use a Kodorider or a Master Jouster instead depending if you face more aggro or control.
No no. Equality is better Vs handlock and Druid. The 2x Equality is the reason why Paladin is favored against those decks. They are so prevalent also through the history of hearthstone, I couldn't see not running them in any near future. I played Midrange and control paladin a lot.
So did strifecro and he hates the card D:
been running zero of them for some time now too, not much problem with it.
and uhhh, I wouldn't change my deck thinking about the Handlock matchup, plus Eadric actually makes up against Handlock for the Equality loss (without even requiring an activator like equality does)
Retired Hearthstone Columnist
Nice deck, although Eadric the Pure? I'm not a fan of him, I think the deck needs some more dragons. I'd swap him out for Chromaggus.
And I'm also not a fan of Justicar Trueheart and Muster for Battle... (Why all the Silver Hand Recruits?) I'd put in some Coghammers and an Ironbeak Owl. The coghammers work really well with the dragons and I think every deck needs a silence.
I'm also a personal fan of Argent Lance, but I don't think I can convince anyone to get on board with it.
Check here for my new cards!Pokemon HS class!All the Pokemon as HS cards!
Mid range paladin puts more pressure on the opponent though.
I wonder if it wouldn't be worth exchanging the two Zombie Chow for Argent Lance, especially in a control deck where you have a lot of high cost minions.
Interesting deck! I would change however the zombie chows for 2 equalities, as a recovery mechanic.
'There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact'
Sherlock Holmes
I agree, I had some success playing Muster even with Quartermaster in my deck, but I feel like it's holding back the deck and also gets wreckt in too man situations nowadays. I did run only one Quartermaster but even with two, it's difficult to get too much use out of it.
I hate running Muster without Quartermaster and I hate playing Paladin without Quartermaster because the hero power seems really weak otherwise. But for now, I'll try this variant without either (I wonder if Seal of Light is worth considering with the Lance, or Blessing of Kings/Seal of Champions with EtC):