I don't get the purpose of a troll thread like this. I'd ask for an explanation of how 4/4 was arrived at, but I already know the answer. What I don't get is the endgame.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
I am dominating the ladder with it... pls buff him and I will have 80-90% winrate but my deck is not in the meta snapshot so you wont believe me anyway,
As soon you change the 2/2 statline it will be almost impossible for the opponent to stop the "2 turn otk" which only needs 1x coin + 1x 1-2 mana spell
I am out of this discussion because I think I remember you from pre-expansion threads. you have your standpoints and hardly listen to any different opinions which are away from your "paladin suuuuucks, pls buff"
Offtopic: the guys who write the snapchats are "pros" who try to grind as fast as possible and therfor they focus on every aggrodeck variation.. or straight forward control decks... otk paladin needs finetuning and thats very time investing, therfor they just put it in the lowest tier and move on with some aggrodin which is a known theme since beta.
I am dominating the ladder with it... pls buff him and I will have 80-90% winrate but my deck is not in the meta snapshot so you wont believe me anyway,
As soon you change the 2/2 statline it will be almost impossible for the opponent to stop the "2 turn otk" which only needs 1x coin + 1x 1-2 mana spell
I am out of this discussion because I think I remember you from pre-expansion threads. you have your standpoints and hardly listen to any different opinions which are away from your "paladin suuuuucks, pls buff"
Offtopic: the guys who write the snapchats are "pros" who try to grind as fast as possible and therfor they focus on every aggrodeck variation.. or straight forward control decks... otk paladin needs finetuning and thats very time investing, therfor they just put it in the lowest tier and move on with some aggrodin which is a known theme since beta.
Good points. I respect your opinion and I do believe you, you don't have a reason to lie about this lol... :)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"As housecarl I am sworn to your service. I will protect you and all you own, with my life." - Lydia of Whiterun
this would be horrible for the same reason rogue quest and jade druid are horrible. uther with 4/4 horsemen would just be jaraxxus (already a card that has defined meta decks in the past) without any of its downsides. would be more oppressive than jade druid at its height.
uther is only bad right now because control paladin is weak against the meta. 9 mana for a total of 15 damage and 20 healing is very strong in a vacuum. the 2/2 hero power is icing.
The DK only good in grindy style game, but that style of game is obsolste now, and I doubt you can defeat a CW with just 1 deadman hand or a Control Mage in grindy game, just saying. And if your goal is OTK with it, does it matter if the horse man are 1/1 or 10/10.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I don't get the purpose of a troll thread like this. I'd ask for an explanation of how 4/4 was arrived at, but I already know the answer. What I don't get is the endgame.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
The card is fair, which is why it's not in top decks (fair isn't good enough).
But it's not bad, has it's place in control decks (as if those are a thing), and most importantly...
Blizzard doesn't buff cards
I am dominating the ladder with it... pls buff him and I will have 80-90% winrate but my deck is not in the meta snapshot so you wont believe me anyway,
As soon you change the 2/2 statline it will be almost impossible for the opponent to stop the "2 turn otk" which only needs 1x coin + 1x 1-2 mana spell
I am out of this discussion because I think I remember you from pre-expansion threads. you have your standpoints and hardly listen to any different opinions which are away from your "paladin suuuuucks, pls buff"
Offtopic: the guys who write the snapchats are "pros" who try to grind as fast as possible and therfor they focus on every aggrodeck variation.. or straight forward control decks... otk paladin needs finetuning and thats very time investing, therfor they just put it in the lowest tier and move on with some aggrodin which is a known theme since beta.
"As housecarl I am sworn to your service. I will protect you and all you own, with my life." - Lydia of Whiterun
this would be horrible for the same reason rogue quest and jade druid are horrible. uther with 4/4 horsemen would just be jaraxxus (already a card that has defined meta decks in the past) without any of its downsides. would be more oppressive than jade druid at its height.
Vvreeeew.
uther is only bad right now because control paladin is weak against the meta. 9 mana for a total of 15 damage and 20 healing is very strong in a vacuum. the 2/2 hero power is icing.
Vvreeeew.
The DK only good in grindy style game, but that style of game is obsolste now, and I doubt you can defeat a CW with just 1 deadman hand or a Control Mage in grindy game, just saying. And if your goal is OTK with it, does it matter if the horse man are 1/1 or 10/10.