Honestly I think your deck has some serious consistency issues. At times, you'll probably pull off a huge menagerie magician and feel like the deck is successful, but more times than not, you are likely going to just get run over by tempo and aggro decks and rarely activate your templar. I think something like this could show better results
If you ever land a beast, dragon, and murloc on a board all at the same time, you've probably won anyway, so I took out the beasts completely and focused on the dragons (you can add warleader or murloc knight in too if you'd like, I personally felt that things like kings were a bit stronger, but as I haven't tested the deck obviously I cannot say for certain).
I got 2 lists I want to try out. An aggro list and a midrange list. If both fail to work, I atleast will have a lot of fun with the midrange version trying to pull of it's combos.
Honestly I think your deck has some serious consistency issues. At times, you'll probably pull off a huge menagerie magician and feel like the deck is successful, but more times than not, you are likely going to just get run over by tempo and aggro decks and rarely activate your templar. I think something like this could show better results
If you ever land a beast, dragon, and murloc on a board all at the same time, you've probably won anyway, so I took out the beasts completely and focused on the dragons (you can add warleader or murloc knight in too if you'd like, I personally felt that things like kings were a bit stronger, but as I haven't tested the deck obviously I cannot say for certain).
yeah that seems like the other route for this deck, i see your point for removing one tribe, but i just don't think that two buffs is strong enough to see constructed play, three buffs is unfair, and unfair wins. Regardless i fee like this deck has a large amount of variations, and I'm curious and excited to see which one rises above the others.
I got 2 lists I want to try out. An aggro list and a midrange list. If both fail to work, I atleast will have a lot of fun with the midrange version trying to pull of it's combos.
Sorry, if I misunderstood you kkbubble, but I have all three tribes is my decklists, so your statement regarding my decklists was wrong. Or was there something in your statement that I didn't see? :)
EDIT (referring to post below): Ok, no problem, just wondering.
Honestly I think your deck has some serious consistency issues. At times, you'll probably pull off a huge menagerie magician and feel like the deck is successful, but more times than not, you are likely going to just get run over by tempo and aggro decks and rarely activate your templar. I think something like this could show better results
If you ever land a beast, dragon, and murloc on a board all at the same time, you've probably won anyway, so I took out the beasts completely and focused on the dragons (you can add warleader or murloc knight in too if you'd like, I personally felt that things like kings were a bit stronger, but as I haven't tested the deck obviously I cannot say for certain).
I got 2 lists I want to try out. An aggro list and a midrange list. If both fail to work, I atleast will have a lot of fun with the midrange version trying to pull of it's combos.
My soul is painted like the wings on butterflies, the fairytales of yesterday will grow but never die. I can fly, my friends.
Sorry, if I misunderstood you kkbubble, but I have all three tribes is my decklists, so your statement regarding my decklists was wrong. Or was there something in your statement that I didn't see? :)
EDIT (referring to post below): Ok, no problem, just wondering.
sorry, i was referring more to notsoclutch's deck more there
My soul is painted like the wings on butterflies, the fairytales of yesterday will grow but never die. I can fly, my friends.