This deck has been running better then my usual creations
I am at Rank 12 and still going strong. It is the middle of the season so I don't get totally swarmed by Aggro Shamnans. I did play two in a row just now and went 1-1 so not too terrible. Then i beat a Midrange Shaman and a Renolock but those two played real bad. lol.
I think the record for this deck is at 9 wins 2 losses.
Murloc Warleader and Bluegill are the Merlons you want trust me. It seems like you wouldn't hit that combo enough for it to be good but it works out more often then would think. You can kind of play slower then you normally would with Hunter as this is a Midrange Decks that leans a little closer to control. I focus on Board Control pretty much every turn.
You win as any good Midrange deck wins. When you hit your synergies your cards on curve are just better then anything they can play on curve.
Hi there. I think Bilefin Tidehunter is much better than a Bluegill Warrior for deck like this and Ysera is too slow. After testing The Curator in Hunter I decide even not to run any murlocs at all. I called this deck "Dragon Hunter", because impact of dragons is bigger than The Curator itself and it works ok, I climb pretty fast to rank 3 with it (and got stuck a little bit), you can check my deck if interested:
This deck has been running better then my usual creations
I am at Rank 12 and still going strong. It is the middle of the season so I don't get totally swarmed by Aggro Shamnans. I did play two in a row just now and went 1-1 so not too terrible. Then i beat a Midrange Shaman and a Renolock but those two played real bad. lol.
I think the record for this deck is at 9 wins 2 losses.
Murloc Warleader and Bluegill are the Merlons you want trust me. It seems like you wouldn't hit that combo enough for it to be good but it works out more often then would think. You can kind of play slower then you normally would with Hunter as this is a Midrange Decks that leans a little closer to control. I focus on Board Control pretty much every turn.
You win as any good Midrange deck wins. When you hit your synergies your cards on curve are just better then anything they can play on curve.
I've been seeing success with my own version lately, reaching rank 11 a few days ago. Don't feel like you have to cram the deck with only murlocs/beasts/dragons. I found that by putting about 7 total minions across those tribes you're highly likely to draw 3 cards from Curator.
Cool. Seems like a lot of people have been success so there is definitely something to Dragon/Curator Hunter. I just really like having a slower Hunter to play with many interesting plays, I usually don't like Hunter.
You are almost definitely right that not running murlocs is stronger. lol! :)
There is just something about a surprise 4 dmg nuke form a Bluegill, or buffing Sirfinely or another Warleader for an advantageous trade that is just so oddball it really makes me enjoy the deck.
I know it seems like there are not enough Dragons or Merlons to hit the synergies consistently, but there are alternate plays consistently enough that you can usually save these cards until you can combo in my experience.
Also the Bluegills are often pretty useful as just a 2 dmg nuke, and Ysera sits in your hand forever so just drawing it early means your always going to trigger Dragons.
This deck has been running better then my usual creations
I am at Rank 12 and still going strong. It is the middle of the season so I don't get totally swarmed by Aggro Shamnans. I did play two in a row just now and went 1-1 so not too terrible. Then i beat a Midrange Shaman and a Renolock but those two played real bad. lol.
I think the record for this deck is at 9 wins 2 losses.
Murloc Warleader and Bluegill are the Merlons you want trust me. It seems like you wouldn't hit that combo enough for it to be good but it works out more often then would think. You can kind of play slower then you normally would with Hunter as this is a Midrange Decks that leans a little closer to control. I focus on Board Control pretty much every turn.
You win as any good Midrange deck wins. When you hit your synergies your cards on curve are just better then anything they can play on curve.
Hi there. I think Bilefin Tidehunter is much better than a Bluegill Warrior for deck like this and Ysera is too slow. After testing The Curator in Hunter I decide even not to run any murlocs at all. I called this deck "Dragon Hunter", because impact of dragons is bigger than The Curator itself and it works ok, I climb pretty fast to rank 3 with it (and got stuck a little bit), you can check my deck if interested:
English is not my native language, so, with a high probability, mistakes were made.
I've been seeing success with my own version lately, reaching rank 11 a few days ago. Don't feel like you have to cram the deck with only murlocs/beasts/dragons. I found that by putting about 7 total minions across those tribes you're highly likely to draw 3 cards from Curator.
Building Quirky Decks Every Week, Loving Life at Rank 15!
Cool. Seems like a lot of people have been success so there is definitely something to Dragon/Curator Hunter. I just really like having a slower Hunter to play with many interesting plays, I usually don't like Hunter.
You are almost definitely right that not running murlocs is stronger. lol! :)
There is just something about a surprise 4 dmg nuke form a Bluegill, or buffing Sirfinely or another Warleader for an advantageous trade that is just so oddball it really makes me enjoy the deck.
I know it seems like there are not enough Dragons or Merlons to hit the synergies consistently, but there are alternate plays consistently enough that you can usually save these cards until you can combo in my experience.
Also the Bluegills are often pretty useful as just a 2 dmg nuke, and Ysera sits in your hand forever so just drawing it early means your always going to trigger Dragons.