Hearthpwn

Yogg-Saron, Hope's End 10 mana 7 5 Cast a random class spell for each spell you've cast this game (targets chosen randomly)
Arcane Giant 15 mana 8 8
Call of the Wild10 mana
The Boogeymonster 8 mana 6 8
Firelands Portal8 mana
Holy Fire 5 mana
Faceless Summoner Battlecry: Summon a random 2-Cost minion.
Herald Volazj 5 mana 4 5
Mysterious Challenger 6 mana 5 5
The Mistcaller 6 mana 4 5
Doomhammer 6 mana Overload 2
Cobra Shot 4 mana
Power Word: Tentacles 4 mana Give a minion +2/+5
Poisoned Blade 3 mana
Flamewreathed Faceless 5 mana 7 7 overload 2
Goblin Blastmage 4 mana 4 4
Violet Teacher 4 mana 3 4
Divine Favor 4 mana
Darkshire Councilman 3 mana 1 4
Flamewaker 3 mana 2 3
Frothing Berserker 3 mana 3 3
Crackle 2 mana Deal 3-5 damage. Overload 1
Savagery 3 mana Deal damage equal to your hero's Attack to all enemy minions.
Blade Flurry 3 mana
Execute 2 mana
Tunnel Trogg 1 mana 1 2
Purify 1 mana
Abusive Sergeant 1 mana 2 1 Give a minion +1 Attack this Turn

This is my take on what some cards should look like to be playable or unfrustratingly good.

No.

Blizzard doesn't like to nerf or buff existing cards unless it is necessity. That's is why they brought "rotating out" mechanism to the game. If you are not happy with some of the existing cards wait until they rotate out.

A lot of these are just responses to the current meta. Hitting cards just because they are powerful isn't good balancing, often they are strong just because there are no answers either available or in the currently popular decks. The most legit nerf out of all these is probably Execute, since dealing 1 damage is so trivial.

There is also an alternative to buffs/nerfs and that is to set your starting health total higher, say 40 so that it's harder for SMORc decks to work vs control match-ups (current meta state in std). There are lots of things that could be changed nevertheless. 

Everytime that I see a person complaining about nerfs and buffs of cards that are ok I lose 1 year of life expectancy.

Increased to 2 years when it is about Flamewreathed Faceless or Call of the Wild.

I imagine you put much less thought into this post than the Hearthstone team put into making the cards in the first place.  

Quote from ROY_nbhgfkdugtdgb >>

I imagine you put much less thought into this post than the Hearthstone team put into making the cards in the first place.  

Quote from ambershee >>

Most of those cards don't need touching.

Call of the Wild is pure BS though.

Quote from Ehronatha >>

Quote from ambershee >>

Most of those cards don't need touching.

Call of the Wild is pure BS though.

Not even for Call of the Wild.  Blizzard's team doesn't make ANY mistakes when it comes to balancing because of all the thought and time and effort they put into it.  And even if something might be a bit unbalanced, it'll just rotate out in two years or be balanced by a card in a new set in six months, so it's okay.

Good job! Agree with changes. They are fair. 

Some people are so annoying with their *Oh Blizzard are so cool. Oh everything is fine. Oh dont suggest anything .*

AExecute and 477 are the only cards that need nerfs imp. Execute the most since its in the Basic set. Everything else are just examples of good cards or bad cards that just need others to compliment them.

I'm not against the idea of theoretically imagining how the game could be more balanced if they changed some cards around. Some of these are totally unnecessary (like Violet Teacher), but it would be cool to try the game out with some of these changes and see how it's different.

The main one I would love to see is Savagery. I think it would be cool to turn a worthless card into a combo-oriented board clear to give Druid a new tool.