Tomorrow I opened a pack containing a golden Baron Geddon. Now I'm wondering what I should do with him. I'm in a doubt between keeping him for when CW might shine again, or dusting him and craft patches.
I do have the regular version as well, and my only other golden legendaries are Ragnaros, the Firelord and Thalnos.
I play this game for about 2.5 years, so 3 golden legendaries in those time seems reasonable. For the rest of your comment I don't get it. I'm here asking other opinions from people so I can make a correct decision. Although I don't really like aggro decks, patches is just that OP right, that i might try it out.
If you're asking you probably give a damn about goldens, otherwise you would just dust it. But you're not sure because maybe baron geddon is a playable legendary (and it is, it was being played in maly druid even). So why bother pretending you will dust a golen playable legend?
I've been playing for 2 years and my golden legendaries were nat pagle and mukla. Those you dust. Earlier I saw a post asking if you DE a golden Alex. Fuck man, it's not that hard. Playable? Don't DE. Unplayable and you're not a crazy collector? DE. Simple as that.
Aahhh right, did not even notice that lmao. It should be this morning :-) thanks for noticing haha. Allright! I'll keep it then :-) perhaps in this aggro meta it might have a place as well...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Hi all,
Tomorrow I opened a pack containing a golden Baron Geddon. Now I'm wondering what I should do with him. I'm in a doubt between keeping him for when CW might shine again, or dusting him and craft patches.
I do have the regular version as well, and my only other golden legendaries are Ragnaros, the Firelord and Thalnos.
What are your opinions on it? Dust or keep?
Link to the pack : http://imgur.com/7uRjDGJ
Also, nice predicting skills.
I play this game for about 2.5 years, so 3 golden legendaries in those time seems reasonable. For the rest of your comment I don't get it. I'm here asking other opinions from people so I can make a correct decision. Although I don't really like aggro decks, patches is just that OP right, that i might try it out.
What do you mean by predicting skills?
I would de him because I don't really care if it's a golden one or not.
He's messing with you because you're post says tommorow you opened it.
As for answering your question if you really don't like playing aggro that much then no I wouldn't bother de him for patches maybe fo
“In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity” ― Sun Tzu
My current disaster-piece
If you're asking you probably give a damn about goldens, otherwise you would just dust it. But you're not sure because maybe baron geddon is a playable legendary (and it is, it was being played in maly druid even). So why bother pretending you will dust a golen playable legend?
I've been playing for 2 years and my golden legendaries were nat pagle and mukla. Those you dust. Earlier I saw a post asking if you DE a golden Alex. Fuck man, it's not that hard. Playable? Don't DE. Unplayable and you're not a crazy collector? DE. Simple as that.
Aahhh right, did not even notice that lmao. It should be this morning :-) thanks for noticing haha. Allright! I'll keep it then :-) perhaps in this aggro meta it might have a place as well...