Hearthpwn

Quote from BosskillerVG >>

Not even remotely true. I have 15 different decks that have a min 65% win rate each. And your "good ole days" comment is bs. The only way to climb 20-12 in 12-15 games is to not lose a single game during that span, which is, and always has been extremely rare.

In fact, there are decks right now in this meta that are stronger than any deck made since  pre-nerf Handlock around Season 2. We are currently seeing some of the highest global win rates of some decks since HS launched.

Quote from BosskillerVG >>

Not even remotely true. I have 15 different decks that have a min 65% win rate each. And your "good ole days" comment is bs. The only way to climb 20-12 in 12-15 games is to not lose a single game during that span, which is, and always has been extremely rare.

In fact, there are decks right now in this meta that are stronger than any deck made since  pre-nerf Handlock around Season 2. We are currently seeing some of the highest global win rates of some decks since HS launched.

so actually you are not bullshitting about the decks are bad, but that we have a slower meta and all of your games need to take longer - guess what - a lot of people are pretty happy that there are not pirate warriors and facedecks all over the place

instead be happy that you have games where you actually need a little bit of insight thought about what you are doing instead of autopiloting it on your way to work

No, they are not. Druid is simply dominating the meta because they are many different viable Druid decks. So, guess what? You run a deck that counters Druid. Not that hard a concept.

this deck is awful

several cards with secret synergy but only two secrets in deck, i must be missing something

4

God, no wonder Amnesiac's profile pic is so sad. So much bullying

rip Amnesiac

It worked for me against Priests but at one match I had rage indusing luck. Fun deck. Hunter should work like this, and we should get tools supporting this original gameplan.

Feels like garbage to play

Looks like shit, but lets try it out.

So, I played 20 matches with this and here is a result of this investigation (see screenshots). My verdict: this deck is bad vs. everything. Current meta is full of cheap taunt minions with lots of health points, that reduces your early agression to zero. You can't spam the board with cheap minions because there bunch of decks that doing it much better. Deck have poor synergy, especially if you can't draw a good start (~50-60% of all matches). 

Screenshots with statistics: 

man in which server are you playing to be able to play same amount of druids and rogue . Is there a good rogue deck out there

I'm playing EU server.

Agree with whiskyfake.

I was looking for something cheap and quick to get me to Rank 20, and this deck fit the bill.  Plus, I used to play a lot of Face Hunter back in the day, so I really wanted to love this deck.

But for many reasons, including the ones already pointed out by others, this deck is not very good.  The abundance of cheap taunt minions have greatly diminished the viability of super-aggro / face / SMOrc decks (even at noob ranks, where you would think that any deck would be viable, lol).

You can win with this deck if you get off to a blazing inferno of a hot start, but if it gets to turn 6 or 7 and you can't Kill Command your way to victory, then it's probably game over.  

If you're really committed to playing Face Hunter, there are ways to improve this deck.  For example: Tracking is way too slow because it requires 1 mana and at least two actions before it does any damage.  I'd swap in a Hunter's Mark to give you some removal that will come in handy if/when your opponent plays his taunt creatures.

Amnesiac just playing face decks? Staggering.