Fibonacci's Anti-Shaman Control Warrior
- Last updated Feb 18, 2017 (Gadgetzan)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 11 Minions
- 16 Spells
- 3 Weapons
- Deck Type: Ranked Deck
- Deck Archetype: Control Warrior
- Crafting Cost: 8880
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 2/3/2017 (Gadgetzan)
- Fibonacci
- Pro Player
-
Country:
-
Tournament Decks:
32
-
Ladder Decks:
79
-
Submitted By:
Link:
BBCode:
Export to
https://twitter.com/FibonacciHS/status/826663772681035776Quote from Ben BrodeRight now, Aggro Shaman is one of our highest win-rate deck, but has a 35% win rate vs Control Warrior decks that are tuned to beat them. Reno Mage is also a bad match up for them. Does this mean that it has become 'correct' to play Control Warrior? It depends on the other decks in the meta, and whether Aggro Shaman continues to become more popular. Fibonacci recently took advantage of the predictable meta and built a Control Warrior deck that did very well against Aggro Shaman.
Very nice control deck
The problem with the current meta isn't out of control decks.. The old midrange shaman was more annoying than the current shaman is.. The problem is how polarizing the matchups are.. Unless you are playing against a terrible player, most games are won or lost before you even start playing.. Even in a bad matchup, you should still have a chance.. But the chance of winning in bad matchups is so hard right now
"already kind know."
Sounds like you kind of know nothing.
I'm gonna be honest with you -- I have no idea what you mean. And I would venture to guess most others don't know either.
the stats are obviously not all on legend though. it says the dates are from jan 1 to feb 1. before legend there's a lot of casuals and i'd say most people doesn't even know how to play reno decks properly. there's absolutely no way you'll see a positive winrate against renolock with this deck assuming player skill are the same. obviously fib is a pro player so with a disparity of player skill that's why theres a marginal positive winrate over renolock, for example.
im not sure why you'd suggest the stats are "not right", they're not forged. it's just obvious when a pro player play against casuals, the winrate will be high.
i myself averaged 66% win rate with renolock last month on my climb to legend with a 95-48 record. when you consider ladder as a bunch of inexperienced players (which it is), the numbers obviously make sense. but it is misleading since a casual player would not have the same stats at all.
That winrate versus Jade Druid is fantastic...:D
Have a pretty good time so far with the deck, 4-1 on rank 15&14 - not a single druid so far.
Some games (including Jade Shaman & Renolock): VOD Control Warrior
Youtube-Player:
Play Pirate Warrior - face Aggro/Jade Shamans
Switch to Control Warrior - face 1 rogue, 4 jade druids, 4 reno mages; not a single shaman in 9 games.
Switch back to Pirate Warrior - 3 face shamans in a row.
I am done with this shit, even XCOM that is a clusterfuck of blind man at a shooting range have less RNG.
this shit happens to me also.
Bratik , takaya hernya uje nas vsex dostala.
This deck was supported by Jade Druid League
almost 100% lost againts jade druide
What does he use to see his winrate like that? I would love to use this.
His brain
It's trackobot
his eyes
Any replacements for Deathwing?
Baron Geddon
Replacement for justicar? Ragnaros? Thanks
you can't justicar helps you a lot to survive the aggro game
Yeah, it just feels so bad crafting it now, when he is rotating out soon. :(