Hearthpwn

I was disappointed to not see Illidan Stormrage in this deck, especially with that title :c

I must being doing something wrong, went from 14 to 16. 5 straight loses. all agro.

Is the "21cm" in your screen name a reference to the size of your, uh, weapon? 

Don't know how to pilot hits, 0/5 :-(

Saw the title- hoped there would be Illidan :P

I like the deck 9/11ign.

cards i don't like in your current decklist

Drakonid Crusher (doesn't provide something useful)
Wild Pyromancer (can work being more proactive, but requires to spend your spells when you don't need them, also, you have Death's Bite and Whirlwind for the same effect)

I feel trolled cos there's no Illidan.

Your friend and kitkatz have the better version. the reason is called dragons. see, even 6 Dragons are mostly one too less. so if i was you, then i would kick dr.7 out and put in Onixya. And why Onyxia? Cause the synergie with Berserker, Armorsmith and co.

I play since month a lot of different Dragon decks and imho if you want to have a functional dragonengine you need 7 Dragons.

I don´t say this because two pro players do so, i say it, because i experiment al lot in the last month with dragons. In different classes too. And from my side i just can say, if you want, that the Twilight Guardian get taunt and plus x/x, then you have to have - to be sure - seven dragons. like it or not, i don´t want to offense you. 

I seen the 4 1/2 hour Video where kitkatz is playing this. and you can clearly see, that he have to play the Guardian or the Blackwing Corrupter without bonus sometime. And the only reason why this not happen more often with only six dragons is due to the good drawengine.

I also like to give a deck a personal touch, but it have to function. And in youre version is missing minimum a dragon, better two.

What you put out from your list is your thing, i just said dr. boom, cause from the mana side he is the only thing what you can put out easily. And the other reason is you need also a big dragon. The smaller dragons have to less impact. And the reason for onyxia is, that the synergie with this deck is very good.

But of course you can put in a drakonid crusher. i like them in my dragon hunter, there i have two. But still, in this version is onyxia the better choice.

Does KitKatz have his decklist for this netdeck posted somewhere? I'd like to see that.

http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/kitkatzs-season-22-patron-dragons-patragons/

Quote from Skylarapas >>

1) Element of surprise. Always works on card games. Noone expects the unexpected.
2) To take advantage of insanely OP cards like Twilight Guardian, or Azure Drake!

Could only Vote up once sorry bro :(

Apart from Chromaggus I don't see the point of slamming a couple of dragons into an otherwise regular Grim Patron warrior deck. Putting 2 gimmicks in the same deck is rarely a good idea.

And with only 5 dragons (including itself...) you're not gonna be able to consistantly activate Twilight Guardian.

Can I ask what the point of this video is? The first game drew into no dragon synergy, and the second game featured a face shaman that just petered out by drawing poorly with no early game pressure.  Didn't see any feature of the deck's dragon synergies playing into the game to make a difference.

Hey I'm absolutely loving the deck. I'm not quite sure about my win rate, but I'm positive it's somewhere around 60-65%. Also, I unfortunately do not have Grommash Hellscream, so I got creative and went with Chillmaw instead. It doesn't work as well, but it has helped me gain the board back and helped by activating some dragon-synergy effects.

chillmaw gonna kill your patrons though i dont get what your thinking here :(

personaly if i didnt have grom id use rag or possible i would use geddon defo not chillmaw though gl :D

Ok i see both of your points, I'll swap that out for something else. Thanks!