Hearthpwn

Guys, I rebuilt this deck a little bit for the cards that I have or I favor. 

Would you guys please advise me for improvements or absolutely must add cards.

Thanks.

I cut Second Equality second Quartermaster second Murloc Knifght and I put Keeper of Uldaman Second Shredder and Second Chow.

Double murloc knight , lol what a joke. This deck is complete garbage for ranking.

Great deck, exactly what kind of gameplay I want to see out of Paladin. Got to rank 5 running a slight variant. I'm running a 2nd Zombie Chow and Loatheb instead of a Big Game Hunter and a Piloted Shredder. I usually find that if I'm behind on the early game and I'm not drawing either zombie chow or shielded minibot. I have a much harder time coming back, especially with Coghammer not having a good target if it's present in my hand. Putting one more zombie in deck effectively boosts my chances of having a good early game card by 25% (or less, if you count Knife Juggler, although I like to save him for combos if I can)

Loatheb is great in combination with stuff like Muster for Battle, to make sure you don't lose your tokens to something like, lets say, druid's Swipe, or mage's Blizzard. Then you can often just hero power and buff the next turn with Quartermaster. Not bad. Also, if you're about to do an Equality + Consecration sweep, sometimes Loatheb can bait the opponent into dropping a bunch of minions on the board the turn before it happens. 

double murloc knight and double quartermaster is interesting ill definitely have to try this out

I could get from rank 20 to 19 without losing and call it an "80% winrate"

If you've got Tirion and Sylvanas you might wanna try my deck out. I've been rolling with 80% win rate with it.

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/386114-80-win-rate-f2p-ladder

any sub for Justicar???

Quote from RoddyBRx >>

any sub for Justicar???

I toss between crafting a lay on Hands or a quarter master wich should i pick ?

In my opinion, go with Quartermaster. Lay on Hands is good for the card draw and has helped me against aggressive matchups, but I get so much more value out of Quartermaster overall, especially when comboed with Muster for Battle.

It's a good deck.

Btw, hey, if you claim to have 80% with this deck, atleast post the statistics.

It's a solid deck. Been running this since Rank 18. Now at rank 11 and climbing. Made only change -1 Quartermaster for +1 Piloted Shredder. Will probably run this until legend/73 more wins till golden or I'll switch it up to control warrior at rank 5+

Sums it up nicely. This deck is good against control warrior. But against SMOrc hunters, there isn't a god damn thing you can do to stop it. 100% lose-rate against those mindless (bot-)smorc-hunters. It's like rock-scissor-paper-machinegun. (where retard-hunter is machinegun (obviously))

why does the community on this site get so butthurt when anyone ever leaves a review that doesn't brownnose the deck creator? Did I lie when I said i lost using this deck? I'm telling the truth. This deck lots me far more games in ranked than secret pally. Are hearthpwn users incapable of listening to opposing opinions & having open discussion?

lot of players have limited dust and will be extremely disappointed when they realize they wasted a ton of $$$ on a deck that still wont beat the aggro hunters that plague the ladder, or maybe the deck will be too hard to use.

I've spent over $400 on packs for "99% winrate!!1!!11!!1" decks that end up STILL LOSING TO AGGRO EVERY TIME, and anyone that wants to throw out a "buyer beware" or even a quick "watch out" gets instantly downvoted for any criticism. It's extremely toxic and hurts the guys looking for new decks. It's like trying to ban 1-4 star reviews on amazon. I've started only reading the comments that get downvoted now, since around half or more of them are the honest experience.

This deck probably works very well at rank 5 to legend, but a lot of lower ranked players are probably better off with freeze mage, aggro druid, secret pally (etc) for climbing ladder.

I've spoken with a few rank 1-4 players and they tell me I definitely can't just grab a "legend" deck and expect it to work at rank 10. I could probably tech a bunch of stuff in to tune it to my matchups, but I'd rather switch to something that will be safer vs the aggro.

Literally all you do is trash every single deck you comment on. Don't tell me you're actually surprised that people would dislike such a negative person as you

I was really excited about this deck but I've lost WAY more than I've won. It's so slow and I am usually always playing from behind. What am I doing wrong? I can't keep up with the faster decks.

I am curious, you must be playing wrong or be the unluckiest person ever. I just went from rank 13 to 8 without any loss even thugh sometimes I had such a bad mulligan

I have been playing this list, but I find Big Game Hunter bad for the meta. Too many hunters and secret paladins. What would you think could help better against those match-ups? I am thinking of replacing BGH (Aldor can take care of boom) but what would you consider instead?