Hearthpwn

  Some might say, I like control, I hate aggro and I wanna all aggro rush decks nerfed. For this I understandingly smiled. honestly Blizzard loves the idea that people are willing to pay for this game--people pay time, people pay money and people pay to play control.

  Some might say, hey I think I've become smarter by playing control, guess what, I think hoarding 30 armor (please stop being pedantic about exaggeration, you are not in the court, nor by any means one of the jury) has really made my game wiser, what's more, I feel a kind of superiority by despising aggro decks as they are all played and for the poor and stupid.

  As a matter of fact, all game styles of hearthstone are equally smart and foolish, they are truly the same, attack is not inferior or superior than defend and vice versa. I am afraid the majority of playerbase of hearthstone are insufficiently educated as they always can't think out of the box.

  So let me set this straight up, the only reason Blizzard constantly nerf aggro and OTK decks is they made less income as they are not as expensive as control decks in terms of dust crafting--which at the same time, usually equals real money investment. There is no real honour in playing control, nor in aggro, it's  just a "control being better" vanity and Blizzard would love to feed millions of players who keep that illusion, like they do matter something.

  Apparently, the tendecy is going control's way, it not bad, it's not good but it's more profitable in the long term. I am not sure, I have all cards in the game but only wanna play the cheapest deck, maybe I entertain myself by defeating decks ten times costy than mine, maybe that's vanity as well.

  Or definitely maybe I am not a fanboy who regards Blizzard as their salvation and santa clause.