Hearthpwn

No problem.

You don't have to hurry on correcting them, because my comment gets irrelevant the moment you do correct the description.

Hey,

It seems a great deck, however it is very expensive. Maybe a bit cost-wise optimization is required?

Thank you for the ideas and the deck!

Hmm, making costwise update is really hard for me to do but I will think about it. Thank you for your comment.

Thank you so much I'm really appreciate all your work.I'm grateful to be able to take part one of your videos.When I come home I will watch your video and pin it in to guide. Thanks a lot again have a nice day.

hey, did some changes for those who are not liking the lucentbark package, would like some feed back

https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1300311-king-phaoriss-quest

it's very stable so far :p

I don't like that package and will say: keeping only 1 offs whithout heal package is not a great idea.

You can put in duplicates making the highlander cards avilable a bit later but the decks overall card quality better, cause of no "filler" one off cards. Only 1 offs is only important here so elise can already copy some heal cards or things of that sort when needed and not only late game.

Therefore i suggest your changes to be far inferior to mine: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1294666-highlander-quest-druid.

My deck plays like a normal Quest Druid (-> better then your deck in that regard) with some possible extra value generation for the later game + 1 more finishing option in Zephrys. I'm currently at rank 5 with it (started at rank 15 at the expansion launch) with around a 68% winrate and a 50-24 record.

Probably not the reply you hoped for but there you go anyways.

Overall HS replay.net gives a Quest Highlander Druid with some cards as duplicates a 58,8% winrate.

Have a nice day ^^

A few things specifically to your changes on top of my other comment:

1. How about anubisath defender?

2. Why still snip snap (its in here to make ziliax always heal for 5 against crontroll)?

3. Psychmelon too slow

4. Vulpera too slow (it can be considered here, as all the heal spells are fine for this verion to be discovered by her as well, the pool with good spells is not big enough to be a consistently good/fine card in your deck)

5. Why keeper stalladris? Here it can get you 1 or 2 extra heals, in your deck it just genereates a few extra cards, with them all being rather bad compared to other cards in the deck.

5. Archmage Vargoth??? Where is it?

6. Considered Doomsayer?

7.  Consider Jepetto in case you keep Psychmelon: all minions got a good on play effect (choose one/battlecry) and dont rely too much on their stats, Jepetto in this (highlander quest heal druid) and my deck are too slow, but with Psychmelon and no eight drop, he can be a consideration to fetch some of that lost tempo back in.

8. Dreampetal too slow (with Psychmelon and lower consistency on your good midgame cards you will always be playing from behind, exept against heavy controll decks, at the point when you play her making it better to just play a good on its own card in her spot, as she slows you down a lot at for the turn she's played, often i think too much that the discount she provides for next turn can recover the tempo loss)

Edit: 9. consider pounce, its in many quest druid list for some tempo, you are obviously lacking.

Thats it for now, more points might be added in the future if i think of any more then i came up with in the like 20 minutes of writing the last and this comment.

1- Anubisath defender is a really solid card and has very good combo with Floop. But 5 mana slot is really strict in this deck and I don't want to distrupt balance of mana curve . In my second deck it is included.

2-Snip Snap is a very good standalone card with some good healing options with zilliax and good board buff target.

3- I didn't test it by myself. I spend all my dust.

4-) I disagree vulpera has decent body but can offer everything this deck wants like draw , healing , board clears. Sometimes it is a game changer.

5-) Vargoth needs to be only minion in the board to be work efficiently and most of the times I cant make him work. But it is included in my second deck.

6-) I considered it but I don't know the card which I should swap with.

Thank you for your comment. Conversations with you are always good but sometimes tiring :D

I think a misunderstanding happened here Siegfried: all these 9 points werent about your deck but about Delugas deck (so these 9 points have almost no relevance for your deck) in the comment i answered too xD .

Don' t worry anyways, it gets less tiring the more often you do it ^^.

Using Floop on Cenarius after you've completed quest is absolutely insane haha... Great deck thanks for sharing!

Thank you so much. I'm really appriciated. After work watching this is first thing I will do. Thanks a lot again have a nice day.

I really like your video thanks to you people who follows this topic can see deck in action thanks for your all afforts.

Thank you very much for sharing your ideas with the community and I had a great time with the deck.  Sorry I'm not a pro player or anything just getting back into HS.  Hope no misplays XD !

Update: 47,4% winrate over 780 games accordint to HS replay.net, seems like a deck with learning curve + it is still a work in progress, so it might improve a bit in the future, i still feel like the heal package holds it back a bit.

(but hey, it is the only Druid Deck that has it's very own archetype for itself (cause no other decklist of Highlander Quest Druid is played enough from enough different people to appear there) on HS replay.net )

Today I played some games both of the decks I made (I lost most of them). Lucentbark package is slow but with lucentbark combo and plays you can made with the deck is almost infinite but in second deck I made gameplay is just too linear. Murloc Paladin and murloc shaman are the worst nightmare of these decks. Other druid matches are like the person who draw cenarius on curve wins.

0 chance vs control warrior

It is kinda funny that the part perfroming worst against very fast decks (the heal package) was put in for beating it in the first place.

My take on Highlander Quest Druid went 10/1 against Warriors (including: 1 aggro rush, 1 hack the system, 8 controll warriors and 1 insta ff Warrior) so far, the key to winning against controll warrior is being able to build a lot of medium sized boards, that could be buffed up so he has to clear them, till he can't and looses. The heal package comes online too late for that. Duplicates of the board building choose one cards (Oasis Surger, Tending Tauren...) make it possible to pull all aoes out of a Warrior and be able to run them over afterwards, with a possibility of copying some cards with Elise when you hit the late game (and drawn all 7 duplicates) with my deck for some extra steam to exhaust their last clears.

1 fact for the end making your comment rather stupid tho: no semi competetive deck in Hearthstone EVER had a 0% winrate matchup against a semi competetive (or better) deck. That's just the heart of the cards (or maybe the characteristics of a cardgame, because draws are always RNG decided).

I beat control warrior while I'm testing healless version deck that I made recently, Original heal included deck has better late game and more heal there is no way to lose against warrior.

you know saying "there is no way to lose" also goes into that "0 chance" category of "nonsense" (just this time for the opponent)? xD

I think this is so obvious exaggeration. There is no point to make me explain what i meant.