RenoJackson's #73 Legend Big Overload Shaman
- Last updated Apr 2, 2019 (Level Up Nerf)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 7 Minions
- 23 Spells
- Deck Type: Ranked Deck
- Deck Archetype: Overload Shaman
- Crafting Cost: 11960
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 3/30/2019 (Level Up Nerf)
- RenoJackson
- Pro Player
-
Country:
-
Tournament Decks:
8
-
Ladder Decks:
53
-
Submitted By:
Link:
BBCode:
Export to
Played from rank 300 to 73.
20 upvotes and you'll get a guide :)
Deck as played by Kiwinbacon:
"Tomorrow" was yesterday, so I would like to remind you again ;-)
But I understand it fully when you are very busy.
I guess Farsight into Eureka into Ragnaros + Spellstone is a lot of fun :P
do you think barnes makes the cut??
I don't see any reason not to run him, it's not like he dilutes your pulls or anything since you are always playing him ASAP
... What?
The screenshot shows a battery life indicator, suggesting it's played on a mobile device.
also the minions stats are much larger on the phone.
Imagine playing on your phone LUL
What's wrong with playing on mobile? Literally no difference from pc.
... that's a silly perspective. Computing power, internet connection, interface medium, HUD, and support programs all make the experience vastly different. Either you have never played on PC, or your phone is one I've never heard of.
No dude, of course I play it on high-end pc. I just mean mechanically Hearthstone is not different on a phone. I go with my friends to a cafe in my place and we host our own fireside gathering and chill on phones. Pocket game is very handy :)
Beautiful deck! It can definitely pack a mean punch and is capable of setting up an immense board by turn 5-6 which is quite reliable I have to say. On the other hand it is also capable of winning in control situations which is awesome for mirror matches.
Since there was no guide, I made a video showcasing the deck in all of its glory! I hope you all enjoy :D
Congrats on high legends mate!
Snowfury Giant not good enough?
+1, because why not :)
More than a guide (I would say that the content of the deck is self-descriptive) I would rather see the meta between that 300 to 73 and the amount of plays (win/lose ratio) to reach this point. The thing is that is hard to say how competitive is the mid range legend meta... It may (but may not) be that there are a lot of players that are experimenting/playing for fun, similar to low ladder gate tresholds (20, 15...).
Well, comparing legend top 100 to rank 20 is... quite the stretch, to say the least.
Also, there is no separate "rank 300 to 73" meta. Sure, In the lower ranks, rank 1000+, you have more of the experimental stuff going on. But if you are going to top 100 legend, you have to win. That's still true if you play experimental / fun decks, you have to WIN to be at rank 300 to 73. So his opponents had competitive decks, doesn't matter if they are fun, experimental or front page netdecked.
Are you sure we are talking about the same wild meta? :)
That's true that after the last spotlight there were more players in the wild, but I wonder how many...
Yip, I'm also talking about wild. But apparantly, apart from the live-leaderboards (which cuts at 200 players), there seems to be no way to find out how many legend players there are in total at the end of a season. Only the vague "0.5%" statement, and I neither know how it's divided between standard and wild, nor how many wild players there are in total.
Also, as I haven't been to wild legend myself for a while, maybe my earlier statement is not that accurate, and you might be right. I honestly don't know.
This deck is freaking insane! Once i found out how to play it, the possibilities of winning gets creative. Well played sir!
Can you do a showcase of the deck, before the guide. I really want to craft the last remaining cards, but want to see it played first :)
Yeah you tell the legend player who made the deck what to do. That'll show them