Hearthpwn

Is it possible to play it without Zola the Gorgon ?

I have the same question? With which card can we replace Zola the Gorgon?

I haven't played the deck yet and I am still learning hearthstone but the bounce ideal is a great thought.  If your exact deck doesn't work for me I will keep the bounce ideal and make  a few changes.... thanks

Any room for Skulking Geist? I think it’s a great card against control warrior.

Quote from jainaishot >>

As to 'shameless vote begging'; I don't want to put more effort into a guide than there is interest in the deck - that's just common sense for me.

This "common sense" is the usual bs excuse i have heard countless times. I am member of this community 4 years now and both as creator and player, i have yet to see a good deck followed by a good guide not getting the attention it deserves.

 You haven't seen them because they aren't getting the attention they deserve...

after one bounce he gave up LOL

Looks intense. Thanks!

Those bounces haha!  Control Warrior just couldn't handle the pressure ;P !

No one wants to point out you missed lethal at 12:45? lol

They did on YouTube LUL

Honestly pretty bad after rank 4, just horrible..

Good deck and write up.  Funniest moment: Druids - I don't know where they went..

Quote from SENA >>

It takes a long time to figure out if a deck is good or bad. You cant just play a few games and call it a day. You need a bigger sample size and maybe you just need to git gud at the deck. Also even if you conclude the deck is bad, it doesnt mean you should downvote. Imo creativity is much more important than pure winrate 

 Exactly this but to be honest i am really tempted to downvote the deck, not because of not having success with it, but because of the bs title without proofs. 79% Winrate...yeah right...And because of the shameless vote begging. However since op has actually put a guide i will willhold judgment and will simply pass without voting.If i had seen it before the guide was added, i would downvote the fuck out it :P

Sorry I can't quite pinpoint what your issue is with the deck - are you struggling to believe that I got a 14-3 record up to rank 5 with this deck or did you actually assume that the deck has a 79% win-rate?

17 games are such a few sample that you might have actually achieved 79% winrate but that's not the point. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and you have none. Not only the game sample is too small but you do not have even stats to prove it and there are plenty trackers out there. Now if you had played the games in phone, you could simply not have stated the winrate at all. But not only you did, you actually put it on title. That's intentional false advertizing no matter how you see it.

As to 'shameless vote begging'; I don't want to put more effort into a guide than there is interest in the deck - that's just common sense for me.

This "common sense" is the usual bs excuse i have heard countless times. I am member of this community 4 years now and both as creator and player, i have yet to see a good deck followed by a good guide not getting the attention it deserves.

Look, i am not here to preach you about deckbuilding, what i am trying to say is that your deck is very fun and your guide is decent, so it would have become popular without these underhanded means. In fact, i would say they hold it back.

win rate is subjective, and it has a lot to with what time you play (because of what decks get played at what time, you can get better or worse matchups.) therefore i don't pay too much attention to win rate titles. But i do get we are all tired of clickbait titles on you tube like 100% win rate with like a 3 game sample size. but Gotdeathstar put in the first sentence of his guide (which cudo's to him for doing a guide, and in depth) that it was a 17 game sample size. i would consider this a decent amount of games for a sample, but if you disagree it was put in the first sentence so he is being straight forward with his information. sure he doesn't have data tracker for it but that doesn't make him a liar.

if you have been part of the community for 4 years you should be used to these kinds of posts, which is probably why you're upset. but you should also realize that negative posts like yours are just as bad for the community if not worse then "click bait"  

Oh but i am neither upset nor negative.I haven't even downvoted the deck and i even praised it for being fun my 1st comment. I simpy criticized the way the deck was advertised based on the general consensus . This is the internet so any claim should be followed by evidence. Anyone who believes something especially this extraordinary without proofs is just gullible.

I honestly do not know why both you and op became so defensive about this. As for this being the norm, well that's the way it is because we allow or even reward clickbaiting and upvote begging. 

just seemed like you have the wrong guy to post qualms to. his title may of been a little click baity, but he was straight forward with all his information and wasn't being shadey with his post

I really tried to like this deck ... simply can't keep up any WR in higher ranks. It's a fun idea, but most of the aggro meta just wrecks it, and the other control decks are much much faster

It takes a long time to figure out if a deck is good or bad. You cant just play a few games and call it a day. You need a bigger sample size and maybe you just need to git gud at the deck. Also even if you conclude the deck is bad, it doesnt mean you should downvote. Imo creativity is much more important than pure winrate 

Most people use a deck for a couple games and don't know how to play it or run into some bad matchups then say the deck is bad.  Most times it depends on the pilot.