Glinda Control 70% WR
- Last updated Apr 20, 2018 (Witchwood)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 16 Minions
- 13 Spells
- Deck Type: Ranked Deck
- Deck Archetype: Control Warlock
- Crafting Cost: 12300
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 4/20/2018 (Witchwood)
- babyspiders1582
- Registered User
-
- 2
- 9
-
Battle Tag:
N/A
-
Region:
N/A
-
Total Deck Rating
9
Hello and happy 4/20. Babyspiders#1582 here. I'm a Warlock main with a little over 3k wins with the class so of course I wanted to put my own spin on control warlock this this xpac because it's my favorite archetype. When cards were first revealed I initially dismissed Glinda, but she is quite strong in this deck and the combo of having her survive a turn then dropping 4-5 Gnomeferatus is surprisingly easy to pull off.
I'm currently 28-12 up to rank 4. For whatever reason hearthpwn's insert image isn't working, but here is a link to my individual class matchups and winrates - https://imgur.com/WSpFfRH
As you can see the majority of my opponents have been Warlocks - mostly Cube, which the deck performs fairly well against at an 11-5 WR. If a deck cannot beat Cube in this meta you're gonna have a bad time on ladder because there are lots of warlocks. The deck also eats up odd and even paladins with a 6-0 record and performs well against the new tempo rogue decks with Tes. So this list beats other warlocks, paladins, and rogues. If a deck can perform well against just warlock and paladin it's a good deck to ladder with in this meta. So with the added bonus of also having a good rogue matchup and being at least even against most other matchups I think it's a top tier deck in the current meta. This deck is not great against Spiteful Priest and Druid, but right now I'm not seeing a lot of those. If the meta shifts to tons of Spiteful decks then this deck is not as good as it is now. Taunt Druid can also be an issue, but again I'm not seeing a lot of those on my climb to legend.
There is some nuance to this deck and a bit of a learning curve on when to play what and when it's perhaps best to hold a card. You have to determine whether or not it's worth it to save your last gnome sometimes to combo or just play it for example. A common mistake I see a lot of Warlock players make is throwing out naked Lackeys on T5 when it's sometimes correct to wait to T6 if you have dark pact and suspect incoming silence. The difference between a silenced 2/2 and a 3/9 that your opponent often doesn't want to silence (due to guldan) can be game deciding.
That's my super quick thoughts on the deck. It's very fun to play because you usually feel like you are the one dictating the match just slowly smothering your opponent. If this post gets 10 upvotes I'll begin to write a proper guide as well as accompanying video.
Do you find lackey to be a dead draw when doing voidlord things? For example, when it is in your hand?
Lackey on 5 or 6 into voidlord just wins too many games to cut or reduce to 1. I've probably had just 2-3 games total where I've drawn both Voidlords this season before being able to play Lackey so imo it's very worth it to run 2 even if you get screwed very rarely.
1-5 with this deck this afternoon at rank 5. Won against paladin but lost against baku hunter 2x, spiteful druid 2x, spiteful priest 1x.
That's probably the worst possible matchups for a 6 game stretch with this deck haha. Sorry
This deck looks super sweet, however I only don't own Taldaram. I'm not willing to craft it, so which changes to the deck can you suggest?
Taldarams inclusion came late in my iterations of this deck so I experimented with a lot of other options. I would probably run stonehillx2 in place of Taldaram and Rotten Applebaum to better fill out the decks curve. Depending on your local meta stonehillx1 and voodoo dollx1 is an option as well. Thanks for checking the deck out and hope you find success with it.