Hearthpwn

WARNING! Elemantals may have taunt.

Everyone keeps saying flamestrike and such, if he's alone on the field (him and the 2 wolves) and opponent uses flamestrike its still a 1-1 trade. 

Quote from Squall99 >>

Everyone keeps saying flamestrike and such, if he's alone on the field (him and the 2 wolves) and opponent uses flamestrike its still a 1-1 trade. 

4 mana 7/7 or 7 mana 4/4? You choose.

Hah, didn't notice that. That's got to be deliberate.

Spirt Wolves is a 3 mana card (we'll call it 4 in value due to overload, although you technically pay 5 total).

This card is a 4/4 stats, which is also about 4 mana (one stat point off the ideal of 4/5).  That's a combined mana value of around 8, and you're getting it for 7.  That's at least a 1 mana discount, and depending on how you value Spirt Wolves it could be as much as a 2 mana discount.  

Generally speaking cards that give you better value than you'd get from combining similar cards are very, very good.  Hard to say exactly how easy it will be to satisfy the battlecry condition, but given it's shaman who already has a number of fantastic ways to do it even with only what we've seen so far, this seems like it will be a great card.  

Strong followup after playing Fire Elemental last turn.

Looks like a pretty good aggro/midrange card.

this card is a 3 creatures in one card with 2 of them taunts, that fact by itself makes it very strong in shaman. Just refill your board with 1 card omg, then put flametongue or finish with bloodlust.

with bran it gives you almost full board with just 2 card combo on turn 10 (in WILD though)

Kinda vulnerable to flamestrike but other than that it looks like a new cancer.

If you protect strong attack minion with it (4 mana 7/7, or even fire elemental) or flametongue totem this may be very dufficult to deal with for some classes like druid, for example.

These are the tokens

Quote from Fleetfoot14 >>

These are the tokens

Hearthstone's official Facebook.

Is that you, red buff? 

HOWEVER, This condition is a lot easier to fill (play a certain number of elementals) than the Chieftain's condition (ALL THE JADES!

JC is a 5/5 and a 2/2 if you've played two Jade cards

Maybe jade decks are indeed hard for you If you still don't know that after 2 jade cards the third will be 3\3

I hope more people think this card is god like u so my jade cancer can win even easier.  

Quote from EverBrawl >>

HOWEVER, This condition is a lot easier to fill (play a certain number of elementals) than the Chieftain's condition (ALL THE JADES!

JC is a 5/5 and a 2/2 if you've played two Jade cards

Maybe jade decks are indeed hard for you If you still don't know that after 2 jade cards the third will be 3\3

 

Quote from Vernula >>

Quote from EverBrawl >>

HOWEVER, This condition is a lot easier to fill (play a certain number of elementals) than the Chieftain's condition (ALL THE JADES!

JC is a 5/5 and a 2/2 if you've played two Jade cards

Maybe jade decks are indeed hard for you If you still don't know that after 2 jade cards the third will be 3\3

 

 I assumed people who read the comment realized that the two jades and the two elementals included the SS and JC, but I imagine that's hard for people who speak in modern day hieroglyphs to understand :D

Quote from DynamischerDiskord >>

Quote from Vernula >>

Quote from EverBrawl >>

HOWEVER, This condition is a lot easier to fill (play a certain number of elementals) than the Chieftain's condition (ALL THE JADES!

JC is a 5/5 and a 2/2 if you've played two Jade cards

Maybe jade decks are indeed hard for you If you still don't know that after 2 jade cards the third will be 3\3

 

 I assumed people who read the comment realized that the two jades and the two elementals included the SS and JC, but I imagine that's hard for people who speak in modern day hieroglyphs to understand :D

 I am not a native speaker, but i don't think your sentence does provide this, because the implication of the conditional sentence would be screwed up.