Hearthpwn

Quote from BombLobster >>

Wtf rank are you playing at where you're facing an "aggro meta" lmfao 

 I don't know what rank you are playing ( maybe 50-25) coz zoo locks, odd pals, odd rogues, odd hunts etc are everywhere from 25 to high legend

Nope, they are at 50-25 too. 

replacement for garrosh in the tempo warrior deck? I have dr. boom is it good enough?

Just play Bonemare, not the same, but better than Dr. Boom.

even control decks can't stand this aggro meta. that's not gonna work

The problem with this statement is that these decks are all above average win rate, so yes, it does work. 

and what is average win rate? percentage

50%, so above that.

to climb the ladder you need win rate above 50%. If we are taking to account like 50 000 games odd hunt has about 49.57% for last days/week,  about 49% for shaman (300 000 games). And only Keleseth warrior has 57% win rate but this number isn't stable because we have 400 games only. that means, sir, your statement and analysis are incorrect

Well, not mine, Blizzards. The claim is theirs.

Quote from N0SF3RATU >>

to climb the ladder you need win rate above 50%. If we are taking to account like 50 000 games odd hunt has about 49.57% for last days/week,  about 49% for shaman (300 000 games). And only Keleseth warrior has 57% win rate but this number isn't stable because we have 400 games only. that means, sir, your statement and analysis are incorrect

You do realize that the winrates posted here, or on other 3rd party sites are confined solely to participating samplers, right?  Blizzard would have *all* the data, which they don't share.

Wtf rank are you playing at where you're facing an "aggro meta" lmfao 

The Midrange Warrior is one of the funnest decks I've played in a while. It farms aggro decks and can steal wins from control too. Replaced Garrosh for Rotface for extra fun 

how can that shaman deck wins vs aggro?

it probably just doesn't.

Add in a few lightning storms, healing rains, etc, probably would do the trick

I've had that midrange warrior deck played against me and it was actually really good, I'll have to try this out

Please, don't even try to bring odd hunter into meta >_< This deck is just feels bad: it feels bad when you're playing it (because if your draws are bad, you feel like you're playing budget 20+Rank aggro hunter deck + you just trying to rush everything into opponents face so there's really  no variability), and it feels bad if you're playing against it (because if you don't have enough heal in your control deck, your opponent can just luckily smorc you down). The shudderwock one can be pretty fun tho, but it's really not for climbing :P

Yep! :)

I'm not sure what that Hunter deck beats except insanely greedy (basically just resurrect priest) decks that draw really poorly.