Like the original deck better, all cards in article are described in details. Well, since he made no explanations about subs... guess this is also works.
That deck is good. But. It differs from the original one from TempoStorm article. Who made this subs? Author? Where is healbot and 2nd drake? Are there any explanations?
Interesting comment, mtdiablo. I mostely agree. Especially with the part where you say that really good players read meta and eventually can manage a deck list that wrecks and shines, but it does not mean that deck would be solid for ages. It is good for current meta, thats all. And this "fast meck shaman" is just one of them. Absolutely agree.
Apart from this "current meta decks" there are time-tested decks, ppl use for solid ranked: Pally, Druid (taunts, 2 combos), Zoo, Hantard, Demon/handlock e.t.c.
Playing good with one of them you not so obliged to read meta perfectly for comfortably laddering.
My original post (which was downvoted hard (which just makes my smile wider)) included this statements:
1) Deck is average (mediocre, whatever) comparing to time-tested decks 2) I struggle laddering with it 3) I made some subs, and it didnt help much. Thats all.
I am not Firebat. I cant read meta like him, even closely. I choose time-tested decks to ladder and strictly dont recommend this deck for ranked.
Thanks for advise, seriously thanks. It is constructive and fits any deck, including this one. Guess I am not good enough to play this deck comfortably in ladder.
You won ))
But here is my statement: If Firebat, winner of Blizzcon, one of the most skilled professional players in the world managed to hit legend with this deck, it hardly means enyone can do it. More than that it hardly proves that deck is great.
I am not telling that deck is bad, i am telling that its nothing special. Average agro, not as solid as cancer meck mage, due to comments below.
Dont you think, that Firebat could have reached legend rank 1 with any deck he want?
3
Good old reincarnate shaman.
I added 1 Defender of Argus instead of 1 [card]Sludge Belcher[/card] and [card]Emperor Thaurissan[/card] instead of 1 [card]Mana Tide Totem[/card].
1 drawing totem is enough imho, and Emperor brings more fun.
0
It took about 2 days of the sweetest deck building experience. Love it. I wasn't hurry.
0
Like the original deck better, all cards in article are described in details.
Well, since he made no explanations about subs... guess this is also works.
0
That deck is good. But. It differs from the original one from TempoStorm article.
Who made this subs? Author?
Where is healbot and 2nd drake?
Are there any explanations?
0
Wow!
2
These guys just trying to get golden achievement. Wrong way. Not a big deal. )
1
This guy visited psychologist before writing this post. Without a doubt.
0
That last one seems interesting. I ll try it. Thanks.
4
I remember commenting the Deathwing card hardly to be found in constructed.
Sigh... a Novice critic indeed...
2
For now can be find in arena decks only... Pity.
0
Nah
2
LOL Iron balls, man!
0
Interesting comment, mtdiablo.
I mostely agree.
Especially with the part where you say that really good players read meta and eventually can manage a deck list that wrecks and shines, but it does not mean that deck would be solid for ages. It is good for current meta, thats all. And this "fast meck shaman" is just one of them. Absolutely agree.
Apart from this "current meta decks" there are time-tested decks, ppl use for solid ranked: Pally, Druid (taunts, 2 combos), Zoo, Hantard, Demon/handlock e.t.c.
Playing good with one of them you not so obliged to read meta perfectly for comfortably laddering.
My original post (which was downvoted hard (which just makes my smile wider)) included this statements:
1) Deck is average (mediocre, whatever) comparing to time-tested decks
2) I struggle laddering with it
3) I made some subs, and it didnt help much.
Thats all.
I am not Firebat.
I cant read meta like him, even closely.
I choose time-tested decks to ladder and strictly dont recommend this deck for ranked.
P.S.
Now downvote this comment please. ))
-1
Thanks for advise, seriously thanks. It is constructive and fits any deck, including this one.
Guess I am not good enough to play this deck comfortably in ladder.
You won ))
But here is my statement:
If Firebat, winner of Blizzcon, one of the most skilled professional players in the world managed to hit legend with this deck, it hardly means enyone can do it. More than that it hardly proves that deck is great.
I am not telling that deck is bad, i am telling that its nothing special.
Average agro, not as solid as cancer meck mage, due to comments below.
Dont you think, that Firebat could have reached legend rank 1 with any deck he want?
-8
Well... more than 2 days to really learn how AGRO deck works... nice argument.
I am in HS more than a year, dude. Ive been legend in some seasons and know how decks work.
Have you any other arguments where I am wrong? Anything more specific or constructive?