Mandatory comment about duration and/or time-stamp : check! ^^
- Phaedros
- Registered User
-
Member for 6 years, 7 months, and 6 days
Last active Sat, Sep, 22 2018 07:45:17 -
- 3
- 7
- 0 Followers
- 27 Total Posts
- 53 Thanks
-
7
Dr_Horus posted a message on Tess Drama, DreamHack Austin, Latest Meta, Unique Decks - Value Town #171Posted in: News -
3
Soldya posted a message on Tess Greymane is Not Disenchantable for Full Value, Clearly a Mistake, Right? [UPDATE]Posted in: NewsActually it doesn't matter in which order Lynessa receives the buffs, at the end she gets silenced anyway...
-
1
hofaho posted a message on Tess Greymane is Not Disenchantable for Full Value, Clearly a Mistake, Right? [UPDATE]Posted in: NewsFuck the hearthstone team. They said they would not change it before...
FUCK HEARTHSTONE TEAM. Really.
I am really disappointed
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
-3
explain time then. Is it logical to say 59:2 o'clock? No it isn't
-24
mmddyy is the most logical one. You know what month it is then day then year. You wouldn't it's 59:2 o'clock would you
3
I know people are ragging on this post but I would like to thank you for writing it as it is at least partially responsible for getting a response from blizzard.
2
it's an editorial
2
Why should it depend on power level? A change is a change.
2
To me it shows how disgustingly greedy they are.
3
It's blatant harassment and cheating. They should be banned for certain.
19
1
Yea I don't think it makes it in odd paladin either. How much does this hurt even paladin?
12
Lame nerf. I think a better change was to make it restore health equal to the health of the minion destroyed.