Blizzard: We don't only base our changes on winrates, we also make changes based on player feel.
Players: Tickatus feels terrible to play against.
Blizzard: Its winrate currently is not high enough for us to look at it.
25
Blizzard: We don't only base our changes on winrates, we also make changes based on player feel.
Players: Tickatus feels terrible to play against.
Blizzard: Its winrate currently is not high enough for us to look at it.
13
Paladin has zero discover and it's easily the best class right now
1
Hunterstone is back! Yeah! facing nothing else than face retarded hunters now! GG blizzard.. yet again, u fail so bad balancing the game!
2
they are clueless
2
lol, anyone with a brain who is not shilling knows its rigged
3
I cant believe how tilted I became after playing evolve shaman for a few hours. Each and every 'evolve' was a straightup downgrade or punch in my face. Screw that rng bs.
3
25 games around top 500 legend and I played against only 1 Warlock (and it was a zoo demon deck)
Even if Tickatus is a good card, the deck itself is bad so it doesn't matter.
I'm much more worried about Druid and Rogue, they seems to be very efficient.
Give it sometimes and you will see, this card is nuts.
5
Quote from user-31021151 >>And that's all that needs to be said about it, gold is the most important, everything else is irrelevant.
The main reward apart from gold that the new system will be offering is card packs from the latest expansion. Which happens to be the single most valuable thing one can buy with gold anyway. In what world is that irrelevant?
No, saving up for the next expansion to buy packs on day 1 is better. Also, you give up flexibility.
9
`WHAT FUCKINGH RETARD DESIGNED THE DRUID CARDS a 5/4 with stealth that draws 2 cards when it attacks, this game has become such a powercreep joke.
2
Quote from TallStranger >>Remember Hearthstone is a children's game. If it was a game of adults we would consider the lack of balance, the mindless aggressive stupidity and the lack of (win condition) diversity unacceptable. Adults would demand furthermore an independent investigation to assess RNG and matchup being free of rigging.
That's utopia. Based on anecdotical experience of millions the question is not if the game is rigged, but when it will come to light. It's like the Higgs Boson. An elementary particle. Theorized in 1964, proven by experiment in 2012. Took a long time, but in the end everything comes to light.
It might surprise you, but there's this silly little thing called intellectual property. See, when someone spends substantial amounts of time and money creating a product (such as the MMR), they tend to not like the idea of other people, you know, reviewing it. Allowing outsiders access to the code is a great way to have it leaked. Once leaked, competitors will emulate/ refine it, and players/ hackers will exploit it.
And exactly who is going to do this "independent investigation" of the RNG? The government? You know there's no "Department of Game Investigation," right? Who's going to pay for it? You? If Blizzard paid for it, you'd reject the findings instantly.
If you and the rest of the tinfoil hat crowd want to do an investigation, go for it. Publicize your methodology, record your games so we know you're telling the truth, collect your data, and test your hypothesis. It's funny: every time someone dares you nuts to do this, you always find a reason not to. Or you play a few dozen games and pretend that proves anything. "I got 4 Galakrond rogues IN A ROW! RIGGGGGGGED!"
I find your signature amusing, since your questions lack courage and your answers lack depth.
Funny respons. Indeed no Department of Game Investigation.....yet. Look at Google, MS en Apple. Big tech are scrutinized on different levels by state actors and international regulations. The game industry is very big. In the EU pricing loot boxes is forbidden. Need to get accustomed to the idea to scrutinize on the level of MMR and RNG.
You seen to be a firm believer that Blizzard is not rigging. Funny. you don't need any proof to believe in holy Blizzard. It's called religious.Maybe Blizzard is a god for the multitudes.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
1
I have to listen history classes nowadays and while listening I want to play some game without story currently my only option is hearthstone but damn I don't want to play hs at all. I will play some old grindy mmorpg it seems
-1
Legendary is versatile but weak for it's cost if it would be 3 mana 3/3 it would be good.
1
it is easy
1.because of maestra you become another class until you play rogue card.
2. Every rogue card you draw or in your hand is from another class
3. so since Double Agent is a rogue card it is itself counted as a card from another class also wording of it is really clean to.
4.For Wildpaw Gnoll it is same you draw rogue cards so it gets discount since it is from another class.
3
Those are mostly alternative fun decks not hottest tho I appreciate it since you can use metastats or hsreplay to all hottest decks
1
You are talking like if paladin druid and shaman are pretty normal and fun to play against lol. Today I hit paladin's face 100 damage but with constant healing and halving the damage and putting ridiculous big minions to the board I still lost. freeze shaman is a ticking bomb you defuse or lose it is unfun as fuck dude I don't want to get stressed over a game I don't want to play a time race in a card game wtf. Same for Beast druid and endless swarm of beasts.
4
Rule number 1: rogue cannot have a viable deck it will be nerfed directly.
Rule number 2: Paladin always have a tier 1 deck
Rule number 3: Mage cannot have an otk deck
Rule number 4: Warriors are pirates or tanks ? we are never sure of it.
1
Lol whenever mage gets good stuff people starts to complain
1
This card should stay as it is. Against paladins with divine shield and buff this card is the only solution.
1
No it is problematic 5 mana 5/5 with rush that always easily get buffed and played multiple times. the card itself might seem balanced but the archetype is not.
Hunter able to take control of board with this card and deal extra damage to the face you either have to protect your face or protect your board control and this card breaks that balance.
2
What OP says is true people in past complained about some tier 3 decks too much made them nerfed especially mage and rogue decks and those decks didn't even effect meta they wanted them to get nerfed because they got annoyed.
Tho Op is wrong about Tickatus, Winrate statistics of Tickatus is not low you know it is actually pretty high.
Tho winrate statistics of tickatus doesn't even matter it just ruins lots of archetypes also it is preventing you to play your own deck. it should not have existed to begin with.