I agree with Barnes, specially the suggestion given by that JFguy
I don't agree with naga sea witch though, the deck is too weak to aggro, or decks with strong board clears, however I don't think the interaction makes sense, since Naga effect is an aura (your minions cost 5, PERIOD), that means all minions should COST 5 indeed, overlapping the giants' card text
I will always play a dirty rat before the turn 5, because, like you said, priest will always play raza immediately after being drawn, so there is no point in holding rat (unless you draw it after turn 5)
You have to make sure you play it just before his turn 5, because you play too early you might grab kazakus or a loot hoarder/cleric/whatever
and even if you rat raza, you might still lose, because the constant 2 damage refreshable hero power is still a force to be feared even at 2 mana
There was a game I grabed raza with my deathlord.....but priest took my reno with his own rat, then I lost. There was this other game which I, out of pure desperation, coined brann + rat on turn 4, it pulled velen and thaurissan and I had no answer
I don't see how I can vote anything other than meta-defining here, I have no idea how this card will be used, but it will be exploited in a very serious way, that's for certain
I'm not gonna vote on this card for now, because it seems bad, BUT mana manipulating effects have the potential to be desastrous, and it is 10 FREAKING MANA!
OP's deck runs an unusually amount of AoE for Reno Priest's standards, so that is why he claims to be so favored vs them. Also, notice that, even though VS data indicates that pala is favored, it is only slightly favored at 54%, so almost a tie
It looks good, BUT I think dude paladin already has enough dude buffs, and this competes with quartermaster which is better, so I don't think it will see play
2
What I've experienced in the wild ladder so far between ranks 3 and legend is that boomsday cards had practically ZERO IMPACT on wild
That's right, a big ZERO, the current meta is the same as the witchwood
0
I agree with Barnes, specially the suggestion given by that JFguy
I don't agree with naga sea witch though, the deck is too weak to aggro, or decks with strong board clears, however I don't think the interaction makes sense, since Naga effect is an aura (your minions cost 5, PERIOD), that means all minions should COST 5 indeed, overlapping the giants' card text
0
and the funniest part is that you still lost the game xD
because you were facing jade druid with control warrior
10
It's about time they add the card sounds for KaC don't ya think? it's been two months already
13
Two months since the expansion release and WE STILL DON'T HAVE THE CARDS' SOUNDS, c'mon now Hearthpwn
0
I will always play a dirty rat before the turn 5, because, like you said, priest will always play raza immediately after being drawn, so there is no point in holding rat (unless you draw it after turn 5)
You have to make sure you play it just before his turn 5, because you play too early you might grab kazakus or a loot hoarder/cleric/whatever
and even if you rat raza, you might still lose, because the constant 2 damage refreshable hero power is still a force to be feared even at 2 mana
There was a game I grabed raza with my deathlord.....but priest took my reno with his own rat, then I lost. There was this other game which I, out of pure desperation, coined brann + rat on turn 4, it pulled velen and thaurissan and I had no answer
0
I'm pretty sure a lot of the new cards will find their way into the wild meta, it has been this way since the formats split
0
the amount of people thinking this is a good card is unbelievable
This card is garbage
3
the only reason why I won't rate this meta-defining, it is because priests ALREADY define the meta, so.....
0
I don't see how I can vote anything other than meta-defining here, I have no idea how this card will be used, but it will be exploited in a very serious way, that's for certain
0
I'm not gonna vote on this card for now, because it seems bad, BUT mana manipulating effects have the potential to be desastrous, and it is 10 FREAKING MANA!
......but it does seem to SUCK
0
OP's deck runs an unusually amount of AoE for Reno Priest's standards, so that is why he claims to be so favored vs them. Also, notice that, even though VS data indicates that pala is favored, it is only slightly favored at 54%, so almost a tie
1
what is this terrible art?
0
This could be good if control warrior wasn't a dead deck
0
It looks good, BUT I think dude paladin already has enough dude buffs, and this competes with quartermaster which is better, so I don't think it will see play