Hearthpwn

Quote from Blues >>

 

there was like 5 cards revealed + 2 leaked

I play Eternal now. But I am still updating the card list and the scripts. I only play Hearthstone once per month, to get the cardback, on the off chance that the devs get their shit together and the game improves.

Quote from ShadowDragonHS >>

2k17

If you run AdBlock, you'd quickly see that the site is bloated with ad trackers and beacons. Last I checked there was something 30 separate items blocked by AdBlock. The site is bloated with nonsense.

If you're viewing mobile, you don't really have the option of blocking all the crap that our desktop browsers can.

Quote from Agithore >>

 

Krul the Unshackled seems like a win-more card to me. By the time you play this, you won't have that many cards in a Mid-range sort of deck, and in a more Control oriented one, you don't want to toss up all your resources onto the board just so they get cleared up. I've seen people using him in decks though, so I'm probably wrong.

Random five votes incoming.

ETERNAL is also an awesome game, by the same company, Direwolf. ETERNAL is in closed beta right now. It is very similar to MtG in flavor and mechanics.

It's 1000 wins in any mode ... tally up all your arena wins, your practice wins, your adventure wins and your constructed wins. So you probably got it quite a while ago.

When selecting from the PATCH dropdown on the Deck page, could you filter based on creation date, rather than last date updated/edited?

Some of the deck creators are editing very old decks (some going back to 2014), and they are showing up under the Karazhan filter. It would be far more useful to only see recent decks when selecting a "Karazhan or newer" filter, and not decks from 2014 (even if they were "updated" in 2016). It makes looking for decks harder, when really old, out-dated decks are intermingled with newer decks.

Here's an example of a deck recently edited (as you can see, the only thing that was edited was the title and description, it's basically a completely useless deck, since it was created pre-Undertaker nerf):

http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/140012-spark-beasty-zoo-s9

And since that deck has a very high rating, it appears very high in the Karazhan filter. Which more annoying, since it's a completely useless deck.

That deck creator has also edited a number of their older decks. I can only imagine they are trying to get more visibility for themselves, and their newer decks (since some of these decks have links to newer decks, while stating that the deck itself is worthless). No deck creator should be editing a 2014 deck so that it links to newer decks, because nobody should be looking for 2014 decks in the first place.

I'd like to see the usability of the deck filtering increase, while gamesmanship from deck builders decrease.

Quote from SchruteBucks >>

i can't stand this game anymore.  how do i simply havea a normal hearthstone experience instead of having ot deal with miracle after miracle?  wheres the fun? 

Quote from That_mAntis >>

i say whatever i fucking want

Yeah. I ran Innkeeper three times. Also, stopping and restarting Hearthstone.

I'll try again tomorrow.

Heads up to the Innkeeper dev team.

I finished the final wing. Ran Innkeeper. It said it synced. But my collection says I am still missing 20 cards. Something is bugged.

tl;dr. Randomly voted.

Quote from Meteoroids >>

I'm trying to use the $20 I got from the amazon Hay Day promotion but it's $10 split over 2 accounts, so I can't purchase the entire Kharazan adventure all at once. I purchased the 1st wing for $7, and now the adventure in the shop costs 15 dollars. Is each wing afterwards going to cost $7? So did I screw up?  I have 3 dollars left in 1 account and 10 in the other.