Hearthpwn

And handlock is one of the worst matchups for priest. Unless you run like 2 mind controls, in which case you'll get wrecked by other decks.

A player of Hunter?? You realise most players use Hunter now and then? They only moan when they have to face it! I beat Hunters most times, I see nothing OP about them. The rush hunter can be frustrating but then so can rush Warlock/Warrior ... 

I don't get people saying Priest in under powered, in fact I find that laughable! Slow is what they are, unimaginative and irritating ... but under powered? when they're using all YOUR best cards to play against you? lol.

Try to go above rank 10 with priest and talk to me again about how overpowered they are.

One dimensional eh? I hear some Priests do I? :D Let me see ... [ramble]

A player of Hunter, one of the most overpowered class in the game, is blaming THE most underpowered class in the game. Yes, I played priest A LOT and every game is a goddamn challenge. Ask some high-ranked priest players.

Inb4 priest with 6 sw:p.

how do you like ow spiteful smith plays?

Somehow Spiteful Smith almost always ends up as a hard removal/fireball bait. Ragnaros "baits" out the second one, although he does have immediate value.

Maybe I should fit in Earthen Ring Farseers somewhere to partially negate weapon health loss? It would be essentially different deck though.

I agree Rag is a really good as a finisher, but I feel that if you are behind, he barely allows you to comeback (unless enemy has only 8-health creature on the board), while being slow enough to hold you until turn 8.

Rogue is more about gaining tempo while doing efficient trades; they can't really support flooding board with murlocs like warlock can.

I feel like decisionmaking is really crucial for the tempo rogue. A slight mistake might cost you a game. And I'm sure you NEED Leeroy and Black Knight to do decent finishers and be able to overcome huge taunts.

Switched out Ragnaros for Assassin's Blade. Somehow feels more impactful, since with such kind of deck you need to get decisive advantage midgame anyway. And blade ends up less of a dead draw compared to Rags. Deck ended up sort of weapon-centric.

I'd like to see 1 more card in the starting hand.

Deathwing is good in arena, nothing else.

Still waiting for Adventure mode.

You can visit Blizzard forums, they have special threads for "clueless noob players" with advices, deck examples and whatever.

http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/forum/topic/12034043452 This one, for example.

Well, it's not like I suffer from not using Assassin's Blade. I feel like Cold Blood is REALLY useful in this deck, as it provides some deadly burst with leeroy/argent for low manacost. I won a few games in vs control matchups when they managed to gradually regain their ground, but coldblood burst combo killed them before they could completely stabilize.

Also, Argent+coldblood removes a 8-8 giant and leaves you a 8-2 body which needs to be dealt with. Pretty neat.

What would you replace for Assassin's Blade, if you run it? It's still not a bad weapon, considering it synergises with Spiteful Smith, Deadly Poison and Blade Flurry. And yeah, it's the "earliest" golden weapon you get from levelling. ^^

Mages are extremely obnoxious at arena. I even got a 12-win with mage using "go for face+3 fireballs" strategy and I don't feel really good about it. Some really obnoxious persons even go as far as writing "Thank you" every time before flamestriking or when you concede.