Hearthpwn

is a moody wretch on her period lashing out at everyone who is not fast enough to dodge.

Falling for obvious bait lmao.

If you got this ban for flaming druids and warlocks then you are my hero

This is why i love hearthpwn! Go get them OP! Bring the salty hammer of justice upon them!

Seriously though i am surprized that Blizzard does something with the reports. I've never reported anyone even though i got flamed so many times by smorcers in casual, because 1) i do not care, 2) i thought blizzard would simply ignore them anyway.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Wait a moment guys, how do we know people flamed by OP didn't deserve to be trated badly? Maybe OP is actually a hero... Think about it. ;)

Well, by the OP's desire to add the people he flames, that requires the people he is wishing to add to be not present in his Friends List in the first place.

As such, that rules out what would be 99% of the cases you could ever consider as being a deserved behaviour (from a personal perspective, it rules out 100%, but I'm looking to see the different perspective), it is not like the OP is being harassed by their opponent in chat or anything of the sort, since the opponent cannot do so.

Which then leads to the question, what exactly would be the behaviours that an opponent not present in your Friends List, meaning a person that cannot interact with you in speech aside from the Emotes which you can disable at your own will, would you consider to be deserving of the OP's behaviour?

Just curious.

Yeah, you can disable emotes, but not everyone does that. Also, there are other types of bming besides emotes, like roping for example. And of course, people playing with cancerous and braindead decks deserve being threated like crap, because they are destroying the game experience for others and so, killing Hearthstone, a game many of us used to love (yeah, it is not only Blizzard's fault the game is dying ;)). Thanks to this "people" all matches are the same. It really doesn't matter if you use a self made deck with a nice winrate when you face the same braindead decks all the time... These days, it's still boring as f...k!!! :(

As I am not only a flamer and a click bait troll, I am also very self-centred and above all, easy to offend. Moreover, it is always the other's fault and not mine and they need to know! Consequently, Bli$$ard banned me from OW chat for six! weeks. So, have faith sister, they do something about people like us.

Still, no help how to fix my predicament, rogues are waiting for my ever wrath after there were able to draw my deck completely into oblivion whilst hitting me with life-steal weapons that magically respawn..again...and...again...and again, getting bigger.... and bigger...and bigger

IMO the best way to solve this problem is using youtube for watching vidyas called "Copyright Claim".
It has length 4:20 - 4:21 minutes and it helps.
Cured my wart, true story, absolute legit.
Must-have experience!
Or sieni.us/?id=21
sieni.us/?=17
maybe.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Yeah, you can disable emotes, but not everyone does that. Also, there are other types of bming besides emotes, like roping for example. And of course, people playing with cancerous and braindead decks deserve being threated like crap, because they are destroying the game experience for others and so, killing Hearthstone, a game many of us used to love (yeah, it is not only Blizzard's fault the game is dying ;)). Thanks to this "people" all matches are the same. It really doesn't matter if you use a self made deck with a nice winrate when you face the same braindead decks all the time... These days, it's still boring as f...k!!! :(

 Whether everyone disables Emotes or not is completely irrelevant, it is solely a choice of the player to Squelch opponents or not. Nothing prevents the player from Squelching the opponent, failure to do so is completely on the behalf of the player.

Roping and people using Decks you don't enjoy are, whether you like it or not, doing nothing against the rules and terms of the Game.

There are few things I hate more in this game than getting matched up with a player in Casual using Pirate Warrior and similar decks, but that doesn't give me the right to flame him because he is doing nothing against the rules of the game. Blizzard decided not to restrict and apply rules to what can and cannot be used, meaning they are not infringing on rules or restrictions, which in turn means neither you, nor I, not anyone else has a legitimate reason to flame them.

If you catch someone actually cheating, using a Bot, or something of that sort, then yes, you do have a legitimate reason to flame them, they are infringing the rules. But someone doing something you don't like that is not infringing on the rules is NOT a legitimate reason to flame them.

It is true, this lack of restrictions imposed by Blizzard, specially in Casual Mode, does cause a lot of disruption to the fun of this game, but players have no reason to impose the rules or restrictions if Blizzard does not impose them themselves, they are just putting themselves at a disadvantage.

I don't mind putting myself at a disadvantage because that brings me far more enjoyment, but the vast majority of the player base is not requires to feel or act the same.

And OP is really doing anything against the rules and terms of the forum and yet many people are bashing him like there is no tomorrow. Isn't that funny? It is Blizzard who must decide OP's fate as a Hearthstone player, not random people in Hearthpwn.

Don't you think OP deserves an apology from these people and you?

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

And OP is really doing nothing against the rules and terms of the forum and yet many people is bashing him like there is no tomorrow. Isn't that funny? It is Blizzard who must decide OP's fate as a Hearthstone player, not random people in Hearthpwn.

Don't you think OP deserves an apology from these people, including you?

 I never said OP was doing anything against the Rules or Terms of the Forum. I also skipped a good chunk of the posts, so I cannot say for all the posts, but from the ones I read, I didn't find any failure to comply with the rules and terms of the forum on the part of the posters as well.

And sure, if you can tell me exactly what I told the OP that you feel like I should apologise for, I can see whether I agree and proceed to apologise for it.

DiamondDM13, what I'm trying to say is that if OP has no right to flame others while playing Hearthstone, neither of us has the right to attack him here fo doing so, because he is not doing anything against the rules here. Do you understand now? :P 

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

DiamondDM13, what I'm trying to say is that if OP has no right to flame others while playing Hearthstone, neither of us has the right to attack him here fo doing so, because he is not doing anything against the rules here. Do you understand now? :P 

 Yes, I understood that, and that is why I said, from the posts I read in this thread, which are not many, I didn't see people flaming him. I'm not saying others weren't flaming him in the other posts, just in the ones I read I didn't see it. I also don't consider that I flamed him in my posts, hence why I asked you to quote me if you believe I did so, you did say I owed the OP an apology.

Seriously? Well, here you have them:

Quote from DontDirtyMyRat >>

Just leave the game. It would be better off without people like you.

 

Adding people just to "flame" them after a loss? Grow the Hell up....

Quote from Xynot >>

Can't you people see this for the sad little troll that it is?  Sadder yet is it already has the 50 post cup so what is the point of this new drivel?

Quote from Xynot >>

You seem to be several responses behind.  Perhaps consider allocating your hard-earned McDonalds wages toward a better connection than dial-up?

(I upvoted Xynot's post because I found it very funny, but it is still very offensive)

Quote from Marega >>

Simple fix. Dont add ppl anymore. U had ur fun in flaming ppl now this is ur sentence.

 

Side note: i dont think u are blocked cause of that. Idk

(Not very offensive, but still kinda aggressive)

And finally:

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Take away moral lessons as you see fit. You already know to be doing something wrong, it is great to admit something like that, but the most important step is not admitting to having a problem, it is finding the will to correct that problem.

You told him that he has a problem, how is that not offensive? He doesn't have any problems dude, flaming people online doesn't make you a maniac or someone with "problems", LOL.

This thread is silly. Can we get it locked already? :P

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Seriously? Well, here you have them:

And finally:

You told him that he has a problem, how is that not offensive? He doesn't have any problems dude, flaming people online doesn't make you a maniac or someone with "problems", LOL.

 Okay, I see those posts exist, but I hadn't actually seen them, I just skipped a lot of posts. Either way, if those require apologies, that is on the users that wrote them.

Having a problem is not offensive. Would you be offended if I were to tell you you have a problem, and that problem happened to be... I don't know, an illness for example?

The OP himself admitted to having a problem, unless you don't regard the necessity to add people and flame them as a problem, which is you opinion, in my opinion, I find it a problem, and I assume the OP believe the same, since he actually decided to mention it (If he didn't see it as a problem, he would be much less likely to mention it)

So is it offensive to point out that the OP admitted to having a problem? I don't think so, but it seems you do. We will have to agree to disagree here.

I didn't say he was a maniac. You jumped into a different conclusion from where I was going. If I actually intended to say he was a maniac, I would purposefully state that, I don't tend to sugarcoat things, be it online or in the real world.

I just said, that he has admitted to having a problem, it is present in the OP. I just added a few points, one of them being, that he know he has the problem, he admits to it, but now he needs to take the next step, which is correcting that problem. And if this is something you find offensive, that is very unfortunate, but I see absolutely no reason to apologise for it.

Where did OP exactly admit having a problem? Most of the time he said something about his behaviour while playing Hearthstone, he said it in a sarcastic way. I think your sarcasm detector is not working well, DiamondDM13... :P 

The one time in quite possibly the history of the internet someone is honest, and people hate him/her xD Probably a good half of the people condemning OP have themselves trolled/BMd/Flamed.

Quote from Routanne >>

The one time in quite possibly the history of the internet someone is honest, and people hate him/her xD Probably a good half of the people condemning OP have themselves trolled/BMd/Flamed.

Or done much worse things... ;) It wouldn't surprise me at all, LOL.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

Quote from Sherman1986 >>

Where did OP exactly admit having a problem? Most of the time he said something about his behaviour while playing Hearthstone, he said it in a sarcastic way. I think your sarcasm detector is not working well, DiamondDM13... :P 

Quote from Thaulopi >>

.... when I try to add someone, the game crashes, telling me, that it has been recorded and I need to restart the game. My assumption: Blizzard blocked me in Hearthstone, so I cannot flame others after a loss / which I have done in the past tbh.

If it is true, than, congrats Bl$$ard, finally you have made a tool to control ppl like me, if it is a bug, how can I fix it?

Yeah, flame me, but help me afterwards

cheers

 

 Again, you may not consider this to be a problem, I do, and it is very likely the OP also does, otherwise, he wouldn't mention it. There is a moral compass in him that made him correlate his actions to his assumed consequences, which indicated, he sees it is a problem.

What? That was sarcasm... And even if it wasn't, he was not saying he has a problem, he was just saying he is a flamer.

Ppl like me = Flamers. Just because he recognize he is one (something he has done several times), doesn't mean he believes he has a problem, dude.

Quote from DiamondDM13 >>

 He himself correlated his behaviour, his flaming, with the reason he assumes he would be blocked. You only make this correlation if you can look at your behaviour as see it as problematic and worthy of receiving sanctions for it.

 

Yeah, a problematic behaviour for Blizzard and others, not him. Being problematic for others doesn't mean that you have an actual problem, nor does admitting it means that you are admitting having a problem.

I had the same problem until I found a Blizz employee to help me. Simply go to your friends list in your Blizzard battle.net app, select the options icon (the little gear symbol) -> look at the "pending friend requests" , delete your full list (or the guys you want to delete). you should now be able to send friends requests again.

also might wanna delete a few friends on your actual friends list, just in case.

cheers

Toxic.  Period.  Learn to lose graciously.  All you have to say is, 'well played' and move on.

 No tear fallen, ever, for a salty forum post of a flaming kid

Guess you got fairly punished. GJ Blizzard!