Obviously a fake. The text potion and name portion of the card is purple, which is inconsistent with every other class card. Also, his weapon is available but the hero has no attack value.
That proves everything I guess?
Well that, and the fact that Blizzard has confirmed no new heroes are currently being developed.
For some reason I hear The Beach Boys in my head right now.... Anyway, yeah, as much as I wish it to be true, it's definitely fake. I also have to agree with Arthas DEFINITELY being either neutral legendary, or a new class legendary for the DK if it ever happens to be a new class. After all, almost ALL of the major legendaries are instanced villians. Onyxia,,, Ysera... Illidan... Edwin Van Cleef... Not saying this is always the case... but the majority of the cases. Granted you got Lorewalker Cho, Leeroy Jenkins (though in the case of the poor group that was with him, they'd inarguably say that he WAS a major villain for the crap he pulled), Archmage Antonidas... Regardless, DK class is a long way away in my opinion. I say that we have plenty of classes at this time, and the game is still VERY new. Give it some time. Blizzard will know when the time is right...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Must not all things at the last be swallowed up in death. ~Plato
Edit: Also, I just feel as though I should say Arthas is perhaps THE bad guy in Warcraft lore. Garrosh, meh. Guldan, meh. The whole story of Warcraft 3 (and Wrath of the Lich King, years later) pretty much completely revolves around Arthas. That's why I think he deserves to be a neutral legendary.
You do have a point there, but Arthas is the go to death Knight. I guess Gorefiend could be the DK, I just think that Arthas would be the best for the class. :)
To me if Arthas isn't the DK Hero he will be the Dk legendary OR the last boss of ICC adventure if they ever do it one day (but I think that the setting "undead" is a bit to close to the Naxx one and their is a lot other flavor to explore first).
And if Arthas end as a Legendary Morgaine is the only Dk Hero possible, he is THE leader of the Dk after all.
If that really is how Blizzard's logic about these things work, then please tell me why we got Anduin as Priest hero when there are MANY stronger/more important priests in the lore.
And I don't think they'll be making the Lich King a playable hero. Legendaries, yes, expansion bosses, very likely, heroes, no
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Well that, and the fact that Blizzard has confirmed no new heroes are currently being developed.
For some reason I hear The Beach Boys in my head right now.... Anyway, yeah, as much as I wish it to be true, it's definitely fake. I also have to agree with Arthas DEFINITELY being either neutral legendary, or a new class legendary for the DK if it ever happens to be a new class. After all, almost ALL of the major legendaries are instanced villians. Onyxia,,, Ysera... Illidan... Edwin Van Cleef... Not saying this is always the case... but the majority of the cases. Granted you got Lorewalker Cho, Leeroy Jenkins (though in the case of the poor group that was with him, they'd inarguably say that he WAS a major villain for the crap he pulled), Archmage Antonidas... Regardless, DK class is a long way away in my opinion. I say that we have plenty of classes at this time, and the game is still VERY new. Give it some time. Blizzard will know when the time is right...
-Must not all things at the last be swallowed up in death. ~Plato
You do have a point there, but Arthas is the go to death Knight. I guess Gorefiend could be the DK, I just think that Arthas would be the best for the class. :)
This is statement is false.
If that really is how Blizzard's logic about these things work, then please tell me why we got Anduin as Priest hero when there are MANY stronger/more important priests in the lore.
And I don't think they'll be making the Lich King a playable hero. Legendaries, yes, expansion bosses, very likely, heroes, no