⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
I won steadily until Rank 15. Now i win 1 lose like 4 or 5. Its unreal. Never happened before.
Im playing tier 1 deck too!
Hello!
Got to rank 10 with Miracle Druid, and stuck here too. Can go to rank 5, but need to craft legendaries for that. Waiting for New Year (saved 9000 dust).
The goal of all life is death.
Stats are good, sometimes it just takes time, look at the win ratios if they are below the average it's your fault, if they are above 50% you need sometimes tens of hours to get to legend. Just look at the top streamers playing 12 hours straight.
The goal of all life is death.
Top deck is cheat
Bring back times when i can play Reno Warlock with Jaraxxus! Those lovely times...
First Guldan DK.. ok fine, whatever.. than that stupid OP KaC package.. what have they done..
So provide statistics and source is not really about proving anything it's about asking you to demonstrate the basis of your thesis and opinion as without it we only have you're word for it and with the greatest of respect that carries little to no weight given you're just a random picture on a games forum.
And only cretins hunt for complicated answers to simple questions dismissing all other possibilities.
Arguing on the internet is like playing chess with a pigeon. You may be good at chess, but the pigeon is just going to knock all the pieces down, take a shit on the table, and strut around like its victorious.
Entered this thread to let out my frustration... this month is EXTREMELY irritating for me, I climbed to legend many many times even though I don't play a lot - ranks 5-1 were (almost) always a matter of picking a good deck, focusing, and I could breeze straight to legend in 2 days, but this month...
Its just ridiculous. Right now Im rank 4. There is no specific deck people play that I can counter. Last 10 games I saw otk paladin, combo priest, big priest, spiteful priest, cubelock, murloc pala, "dude" pala, zoo, secret mage, minionless hunter and midrange hunter. Not even 1 repeat. Meanwhile whatever I queue with, I constantly get decks with teched-in counters, like eaters of secrets against my secret mage or oozes against my cubelock - while I don't play murloc pala, I bet I would encounter hungry crabs the moment I queue with it, as its known some people tech them. Today I tried to trihard to rank up, but after 40 games I'm exactly at 50% winrate and completely nothing works.
Same to me, betweeen 15 and 12 😡
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorJust look up Barnes Hunter.
I used that to go from 15 to 5 pretty much without a loss. Easiest ladder climbI’ve had so far in fairness.
Am now sat at rank 4-5 and havin a ball with meme decks now the annoying climbing business is out the way for the month. :-)
Arguing on the internet is like playing chess with a pigeon. You may be good at chess, but the pigeon is just going to knock all the pieces down, take a shit on the table, and strut around like its victorious.
I know the feeling of queuing up bad matchup after bad matchup, but if you have replays, you really should look at them and see where you were outplayed, where RNG truly took hold of the outcome of the game, and where you made mistakes.
If you're honest with yourself, either you made misplays or you are the single most unlucky player in the history of Hearthstone. Either way, there's nothing to be done but keep trying and learn from your mistakes. If your gripe is with the meta, so what? You can't do anything to change it by complaining. It's about persistence and a mix of understanding your deck and your opponents' decks. I'm still learning to consider possibilities and tech cards; it's tough, but not worth coming to Hearthpwn to cry about and then try to defend your claims without any proof.
Seriously, if you post replays, the community will help you analyze your deck and strategy, point out misplays, etc. Give it a try, and best of luck in your future ladder matches!
Rage quitting: the best way to ensure your opponent knows they beat a giant baby.
Rather than go back and mess with multi-quoting everything, Ill just try to replay to a few of the points that caught my attention.
"Prove it ..." ... That's the thing ... there is no way to do this (and I imagine you know this, so that is why it is the easiest way to try to stifle the debate on the subject). Without literally having some kind of Blizzard development insider to blow the whistle, there is no way to "prove" this. That is where common sense comes in. You know .. if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck ... it's most likely a duck.
"The meta changes too fast" ... This is one of the things that would of course be a legitimate point, except for one thing. The massive number of people playing the game, and the massive number of games played. It's not really logical to think that millions of people all decided to make a change (not just a change, but make the same change) at the same time. To use this a an explanation for the very rapid, and very noticeable differences in matchups, we would have to believe that at roughly the same time, a vast majority of players all decided to swap from playing one type of deck, to playing another.
Again, very small sample size, but last night I picked 2 decks, control warlock, and an off-meta (but pretty effective) Jaina mage.
My matchups with Control Warlock were 36% Priest (it's weakest matchup), 18% Paladin (it's best matchup), and 19% Warlock (mirror matches or cubes, both of which are pretty much a coin toss). 22 games played, 64% Winrate overall.
With the mage, I faced only 23% mage and 12% Paladin (its worst matchups), with 11% Priest and 18% Warlock, (it's favored matchups). 22 games played, 49% Win Rate. More notably, I also faced a couple aggro druids, and a couple Warriors (two classes / decks that I didn't even see when playing control, but would have been heavily favored to win).
Yes, it doesn't prove anything ... but i don't see how it anyone can look at those stats and not raise a brow. Hell .. just look at the priest numbers ... 36% to 11%.
I wanna glide down, over Mulholland
I wanna write her, name in the sky
I wanna free fall, out into nothin'
Gonna leave this, world for awhile
Arguing on the internet is like playing chess with a pigeon. You may be good at chess, but the pigeon is just going to knock all the pieces down, take a shit on the table, and strut around like its victorious.