I am pretty sure other people already said this, but it's still too early to know if Druid and Priest hav really goinf down. Although if what you said in the first day of the balance patch is true, then maybe they truly wen down but surely not to only 50%
I am pretty sure other people already said this, but it's still too early to know if Druid and Priest hav really goinf down. Although if what you said in the first day of the balance patch is true, then maybe they truly wen down but surely not to only 50%
I am pretty sure other people already said this, but it's still too early to know if Druid and Priest hav really goinf down. Although if what you said in the first day of the balance patch is true, then maybe they truly wen down but surely not to only 50%
they no longer show individual deck break down like they did when i started this thread, but if kazakus priest or jade druid were winning lots of games, people would play it and it would show up in the percentage
best thing about this thread is it's full of people who judged the meta before a single game was played, complaining about judging the meta too early after thousands are played
Sorry to disappoint you but these stats mean pretty much nothing .
People are playing un-optimal builds at the moment . Wait for them to find the right substitutes to nerfed cards and than we can talk about the meta .
I played Druid whole day and my win rate isn't any worse than before .
the stats of hundreds of games means more than your stats today
Technically you're both right.
The stats DO matter; they may well change but they may not either. The stats for example ARE showing decks using the same card lists (with the nerfed cards) doing worse on average. Clearly there was impact. We will see if those decks can experiment with different lists. robert_fanr is right that this can change, but that doesn't make the stats mean nothing.
Personal play can be more telling IF there's a reason why it tells more than new stats; is the player particularly good, so their specific adjustments and plays are more telling than other players? Or, conversely, are they very bad and lose more than normal OR simply play at low rank and win more with bad decks because of the opponents their MMR pits them against? =P
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Sorry to disappoint you but these stats mean pretty much nothing .
People are playing un-optimal builds at the moment . Wait for them to find the right substitutes to nerfed cards and than we can talk about the meta .
I played Druid whole day and my win rate isn't any worse than before .
I am pretty sure other people already said this, but it's still too early to know if Druid and Priest hav really goinf down. Although if what you said in the first day of the balance patch is true, then maybe they truly wen down but surely not to only 50%
I really dont care if jade druid is 10%. Jade mechanic is moronic and should be removed from the game yesterday.
best thing about this thread is it's full of people who judged the meta before a single game was played, complaining about judging the meta too early after thousands are played