whats the problem? this class actually requires skill (except for aggro/pirate) or do you want to see more braindead shamans?
Problem? Never said there was a problem with the class dude, but I think most people would like a diverse meta, not a single class meta. It is more a problem with Blizzard then anything. I also think this is kinda unprecedented, I mean it is nearly all warriors lol, its unreal
whats the problem? this class actually requires skill (except for aggro/pirate) or do you want to see more braindead shamans?
Problem? Never said there was a problem with the class dude, but I think most people would like a diverse meta, not a single class meta. It is more a problem with Blizzard then anything. I also think this is kinda unprecedented, I mean it is nearly all warriors lol, its unreal
Yeah,reminds me of the patron meta,the core cards this class has, compared to the others, is so ridiculously good that they just dominate the meta every single time,and now they dominate with every single archetype as well,why play other classes,this one has it all,which is annoying.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The 1st step towards a better game is firing Mike Donais! We had enough of his "skillful" balances!
whats the problem? this class actually requires skill (except for aggro/pirate) or do you want to see more braindead shamans?
Problem? Never said there was a problem with the class dude, but I think most people would like a diverse meta, not a single class meta. It is more a problem with Blizzard then anything. I also think this is kinda unprecedented, I mean it is nearly all warriors lol, its unreal
Yeah,reminds me of the patron meta,the core cards this class has, compared to the others, is so ridiculously good that they just dominate the meta every single time,and now they dominate with every single archetype as well,why play other classes,this one has it all,which is annoying.
The absolute truth, they do all things better then every other class. Top control class, Top aggro class with upgrade/Bloodsail cultist like 8 damage for 1 mana, great mid range class as well. Super annoying on Blizzards part for class card design.
It's not so bad if a single class is dominating as it is if a single deck is dominating. At least within warrior, we have aggro, tempo, midrange, and control.
I agree it's not optimal, but in my opinion, 4 different archetypes of warrior beats 4 face decks using different classes any day of the week.
Sorry you can't gain free wins with aggro man.Those pesky warrior players why they don't let you enjoy the 3minutes wins..ts ts ts.Those scums...it's not that you are punished hard if you dare to play any other control or pure tempo deck(not the aggroish bullshit)!Oh wait....
whats the problem? this class actually requires skill (except for aggro/pirate) or do you want to see more braindead shamans?
Problem? Never said there was a problem with the class dude, but I think most people would like a diverse meta, not a single class meta. It is more a problem with Blizzard then anything. I also think this is kinda unprecedented, I mean it is nearly all warriors lol, its unreal
Yeah,reminds me of the patron meta,the core cards this class has, compared to the others, is so ridiculously good that they just dominate the meta every single time,and now they dominate with every single archetype as well,why play other classes,this one has it all,which is annoying.
The absolute truth, they do all things better then every other class. Top control class, Top aggro class with upgrade/Bloodsail cultist like 8 damage for 1 mana, great mid range class as well. Super annoying on Blizzards part for class card design.
This is true, but I actually think Warrior is an example of good class design and it just shows how poorly other classes are designed.
Warrior is versatile and has a lot of different archetypes with no major achilles heel in terms of match-ups, but none of the archetypes are way too powerful like Patron used to be.
Other classes have only one good archetype (except Warlock), are held back by a very small pool of good core cards, and the cards that do make those classes playable are so potentially OP they would make the class too good if it wasn't being restrained by its lack of options.
Interesting that there is a warrior complain thread, and most of the comments are about whining or how it is better than hunterstone or whatever. Meanwhile a shaman complain thread has few comments about whining, and how it is the end of the game.
Bias. Also if you create salt threads like a retard (there is a sticky for this already) you have no right to complain about anyone else creating a thread. Even if it is about your cherished control warrior or whatever. Don't be a hypocrit
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Anyone else playing at min. 80% warriors....good lord man
whats the problem? this class actually requires skill (except for aggro/pirate) or do you want to see more braindead shamans?
Yeah Warriors are all over the place these days
yeah it's great, just free wins for my renolock :]
Probably the problem is that most of the warriors are aggro/pirate :(
The 1st step towards a better game is firing Mike Donais! We had enough of his "skillful" balances!
#FireMikeDonais
Meanwhile in wild you basically face diffrent deck each game below rank 15, feelsgoodman.
Could be Shamanstone or Warlockstone too. At least Warriorstone is better than those 2 cancerdecks..
Editor of the Heartpwn Legendary Crafting Guide:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/205920-legendary-tier-list-crafting-guide
It's not so bad if a single class is dominating as it is if a single deck is dominating. At least within warrior, we have aggro, tempo, midrange, and control.
I agree it's not optimal, but in my opinion, 4 different archetypes of warrior beats 4 face decks using different classes any day of the week.
PSN: RoStGy
Sorry you can't gain free wins with aggro man.Those pesky warrior players why they don't let you enjoy the 3minutes wins..ts ts ts.Those scums...it's not that you are punished hard if you dare to play any other control or pure tempo deck(not the aggroish bullshit)!Oh wait....
I rarely run in to warriors. Is it at higher rank? Because I don't play very much and don't climb very high. Usually just get to around 15.
You do not truly know someone, until you fight them.....
There aren't nearly as many warriors on the ladder as there are whiners on this forum
It was Hunterstone, Palastone, Shamanstone, now Warriorstone?
Damn, people!!! Don't be such whiners and play hearthstone!!!
Interesting that there is a warrior complain thread, and most of the comments are about whining or how it is better than hunterstone or whatever. Meanwhile a shaman complain thread has few comments about whining, and how it is the end of the game.
Bias. Also if you create salt threads like a retard (there is a sticky for this already) you have no right to complain about anyone else creating a thread. Even if it is about your cherished control warrior or whatever. Don't be a hypocrit