Yes, I admit: I never make my own decks. Sometimes I try, for example when a new expansion comes out. But after 1-2 weeks, I just come here to see what this community has created and 'borrow' the decks. Why? Because I suck at deckbuilding. And that doesn't make me a bad player: I honestly think my skill level is comparable to the pros'. I'm not even kidding: I reached legend 3 times (the only times I tried) and consistently reach rank 5 every month mostly with control decks (so you don't come up and say that everyone can reach legend with face hunter or braindead decks like that, because I never use them). Also I follow many hs youtubers and most tournaments and often I find myself thinking a better play than the pros do. An example: semifinals 2015, thijs vs ostkaka. I saw the play of pinging my own face in freeze mage mirror before he made the play and before the casters started saying 'what an amazing play!!' or whatever. I also wouldn't have missed lethal if I were ostkaka playing patron by whirlwinding before attacking with the patron close to the flametongue totem. You are free not to believe me, but I can bet my ass I'm not lying nor telling the story bigger than it is. I'm just actually that good at the game. That being said, one thing I cannot do that pros actually do is deckbuilding. Also I think that not all pros are actually good at it. Because deckbuilding is an art and it's incredibly hard to come up with a competitive deck. That's why I netdeck. Also why is that a bad thing? I mean, I don't even like that part of the game, it's incredibly boring. I like playing games with a good deck, doesn't matter if it's made by me or not. Also, if people just post their decks here, why shouldn't I use them? Then what's the point of posting at all? Well, these are just my thoughts, let me know what you think on the topic
Ehm, without reading the replies to this post and running the risk of repeating them, let me just say that deck building is a good part of the skill in this game, and sometimes you see decks in tournaments that you don't see on the ladder because the really "pro" players have a good understanding of deckbuilding. I am not a pro player but if I'm judging myself then I prefer to get legend with my own decks (well, they're only really 25% mine since its hard to come up with a wholly new archetype).
Coz not any1 haz the t1me t0 play 24/7 or money t0 attend tournaments.
Nice constructive comment btw.
Wow, you are like so cool writing with numbers and stuff. How do you do that? Is it because you didn't have time to attend school?
There's nothing constructive to be said to a thread where you're just stroking your ego.
The website didn't work, but I actually quoted chiribuchiriba with that comment. That wasn't referred to you.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
Doesnt this happen in every TCG community? like everyone plays a trendy deck and just techs some cards in it to win mirror matches or something. I see no point in this thread
There is no skill PLAYING this game. There are 6 years old children in legend ranks.
99% of the skill in this game -> deck building, sorry op.
Being able to reach legend with a netdeck only proves one thing : that you have functional eyes and brain, and no girlfriend.
100% of pro players know how to build decks. You don't build decks, you're not a pro player, that's it.
I actually agree with what you are saying: I think that this game is mainly based on:
-deck
-luck connected to finding a good matchup
-luck connected to having good draws
-luck connected to your oppenent having good draws
-general rng luck
Your winning chances are for the most part relying on luck and creating the deck. I don't really agree that ALL pros are actually all that good: just look at Dog or SilentStorm playing on tournaments and you'll understand what I'm talking about. If you think that 99% of what makes you a good player is deckbuilding, you might be right. In that case I suck at this game. But this means that also 90% of the HS players suck at the game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
True netdecks evolve over a period of time, with the collective internet coming together to perfect a certain deck. That is how we got definitive lists for powerhouse decks like Patron and Secret Paladin. The innovation (aka a new deck) starts somewhere, and is then copied, refined, adjusted, copied again, etc. to the point of a near perfect list. At that point, people will tweak the netdeck according to their own preferences, meta choices, and card availability, but those are just that: tweaks.
My point is: people who think their own creative decks will ever be anywhere near as competitive as the "known" netdecks, are delusional. Do you honestly believe you, on your own, are a better deck builder than the countless of people working on a single deck put together? Sure, your own deck might be fun, and it might win some of the games some of the time, but it will never be on the same level as netdecks.
Show me a single example of a player (pro or not) who has made a "new" deck which later turned out to be the best possible version of that deck.
True netdecks evolve over a period of time, with the collective internet coming together to perfect a certain deck. That is how we got definitive lists for powerhouse decks like Patron and Secret Paladin. The innovation (aka a new deck) starts somewhere, and is then copied, refined, adjusted, copied again, etc. to the point of a near perfect list. At that point, people will tweak the netdeck according to their own preferences, meta choices, and card availability, but those are just that: tweaks.
My point is: people who think their own creative decks will ever be anywhere near as competitive as the "known" netdecks, are delusional. Do you honestly believe you, on your own, are a better deck builder than the countless of people working on a single deck put together? Sure, your own deck might be fun, and it might win some of the games some of the time, but it will never be on the same level as netdecks.
Show me a single example of a player (pro or not) who has made a "new" deck which later turned out to be the best possible version of that deck.
Cursed's aggro druid is the only real example I can think of. I looked up his old list and it was pretty similar to the one that saw major play until LOE.
That said, in general I agree with you. My usual deckbuilding process is
1. Get new deck idea, try a rough version.
2. Start making tweaks to get it just right.
3. Realize my deck is strictly inferior to a similar tier 2 meta deck, switch to that.
But maybe other people are better deckbuilders than me and have different experiences.
If you netdeck you have to endure being called a "netdecker", because that's neither a lie nor an insult but a fact. If you have a negative connotation for the word, it simply means that you know yourself that it's a lazy way out and showcases a lack of (deckbuilding) skill.
That's all there is to it.
Te be honest, "deckbuilding" is the actual skill in HS, since the game itself so easy to pilot. Give a new player a FOTM tier 1 deck, and I can assure you he can reach legend within a month. Tho, the HS card pool is limited and many decks auto-build themselves to a certain degree, so even that point is kinda moot.
What agitates me is when a FOTM netdecker face shaman BMs on top. That's prime jerk asshat behavior. That's like cheating on a test and then boasting about being "so intelligent". It's pathetic, really.
If you netdeck you have to endure being called a "netdecker", because that's neither a lie nor an insult but a fact. If you have a negative connotation for the word, it simply means that you know yourself that it's a lazy way out and showcases a lack of (deckbuilding) skill.
That's all there is to it.
Te be honest, "deckbuilding" is the actual skill in HS, since the game itself so easy to pilot. Give a new player a FOTM tier 1 deck, and I can assure you he can reach legend within a month. Tho, the HS card pool is limited and many decks auto-build themselves to a certain degree, so even that point is kinda moot.
What agitates me is when a FOTM netdecker face shaman BMs on top. That's prime jerk asshat behavior. That's like cheating on a test and then boasting about being "so intelligent". It's pathetic, really.
You got the point
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
Te be honest, "deckbuilding" is the actual skill in HS, since the game itself so easy to pilot. Give a new player a FOTM tier 1 deck, and I can assure you he can reach legend within a month.
That's nonsense. Hearthstone is by no means the hardest card game ever, but saying it's that easy to reach legend is just wrong. Even the most simple decks (play cards -> go face) have a lot of strategy behind them, that new players simply don't know yet.
That's nonsense. Hearthstone is by no means the hardest card game ever, but saying it's that easy to reach legend is just wrong. Even the most simple decks (play cards -> go face) have a lot of strategy behind them, that new players simply don't know yet.
You have seen every deck and know its contents within a single week, maybe even days. Many cards also aren't impacting your gameplan at all and are of no concern. Given enough TIME and a FOTM tier 1 deck and a new player can reach legend within a single season. The skill ceiling is THAT low in HS.
I don't mind net deckers. What I do mind is Hearthpwn having a list of decks on the front page, so then when I start queuing up I get to play against the same Shaman deck every other game. Please get rid of that crap.
I feel if people don't net deck they can't ever be as good as people who do. I'm not talking about getting exact decklists off the internet except more like the archtypes. If I make my own aggro shaman or my own zoo that has like 3 different cards or even like 10 different cards I still consider it a netdeck because I didn't create the archtype. I wouldn't have came up with the idea of the deck or anything it would just be a slightly different zoo. That's why I think someone who truly builds decks completely from scratch and tries to come up with new archtypes will 90% just have a bad, unrefined deck that will never be competitive. When people claim they don't netdeck, and then use tempo mage except its actually just regular tempo mage with the exception of like 4 cards you are not a deckbuilder at all.
I certainly believe you. I often find myself in the same position regarding professional plays/players. I am very good as well. However, I love deckbuilding and find the theorycraft aspect of the game to put me in a more edjucated position when making my desicions during plays/spectating. But making the same desicion that I would in the same hypothetical position would absolutely be possible from another strategic background. I see your point and agree with your perspective. This is not my native language.
40 Million people play a game that has a card pool of less than 1,500 cards. Anyone who thinks their deck is original is an idiot.
That said, there is a difference between "my deck is original" meaning it's completely unique and different from any other deck, and "my deck is original" meaning YOU made it without looking up a deck list of cards. So yes, my decks are completely "original" because I've never built a deck using someone else's blueprint. However, there are probably a handful of players out there that have very similar decks, just by sheer coincidence. BUT! I think you are overestimating the sheer mathematical odds of all decks being used by everyone else. Given the number of available cards AND the quantity of cards you can put in your deck, it is mathematically possible that there are thousands of unique decks being played that no one else is playing -- they may differ by one or two cards, but still.
That's nonsense. Hearthstone is by no means the hardest card game ever, but saying it's that easy to reach legend is just wrong. Even the most simple decks (play cards -> go face) have a lot of strategy behind them, that new players simply don't know yet.
You have seen every deck and know its contents within a single week, maybe even days. Many cards also aren't impacting your gameplan at all and are of no concern. Given enough TIME and a FOTM tier 1 deck and a new player can reach legend within a single season. The skill ceiling is THAT low in HS.
I disagree. The sheer number of completely terrible people you see in the various streams/videos are perfect proof that Hearthstone isn't as easy as you claim.
40 Million people play a game that has a card pool of less than 1,500 cards. Anyone who thinks their deck is original is an idiot.
That said, there is a difference between "my deck is original" meaning it's completely unique and different from any other deck, and "my deck is original" meaning YOU made it without looking up a deck list of cards. So yes, my decks are completely "original" because I've never built a deck using someone else's blueprint. However, there are probably a handful of players out there that have very similar decks, just by sheer coincidence. BUT! I think you are overestimating the sheer mathematical odds of all decks being used by everyone else. Given the number of available cards AND the quantity of cards you can put in your deck, it is mathematically possible that there are thousands of unique decks being played that no one else is playing -- they may differ by one or two cards, but still.
That's only true if you count all the cards. If you are serious about deckbuilding you know which cards are worth even considering and which ones are not. Then there's the additional constraint that you are not going to build a deck with an impossible curve, and some more constraints which I will not go into, but my point is that it isn't as high as purely mathematical nonsense makes it out to be. If you want to make a mathematical argument you need to be more careful.
You people need to understand that it is not possible to not plagiarize in this game to an unknown extent, because what works and what not is already there for you to find whether you check a list or not. You will eventually run into it on ladder. The original ideas you have do not make a whole deck, and even if they make a good part of the deck as in the case of when Grim Patron Warrior first appeared, it is the pro HS community that will refine it and make it a tier 1 deck. A good deck is not a one man's job, and you don't even have a good claim on your own decks because the ideas are out there already even if you don't remember seeing them. You are not completely self-aware. Maybe you have a legit claim on one idea or another but you do not have a legit claim on a whole deck and never will. That's a very silly and intellectualy immature thought.
Having said that, netdeckers are not good players.
You people need to understand that it is not possible to not plagiarize in this game to an unknown extent, because what works and what not is already there for you to find whether you check a list or not. You will eventually run into it on ladder. The original ideas you have do not make a whole deck, and even if they make a good part of the deck as in the case of when Grim Patron Warrior first appeared, it is the pro HS community that will refine it and make it a tier 1 deck. A good deck is not a one man's job, and you don't even have a good claim on your own decks because the ideas are out there already even if you don't remember seeing them. You are not completely self-aware. Maybe you have a legit claim on one idea or another but you do not have a legit claim on a whole deck and never will. That's a very silly and intellectualy immature thought.
Having said that, netdeckers are not good players.
I've yet to see another player using a midrange Zoolock list with Ancient harbinger, C'thun and nerfed Knife juggler. Am I immature thinking my deck is original ? No I think you will be immature replying this is just a netdeck zoo with some changes.
And it definitely is a one man's job refining this deck, because it runs cards people consider trash especially in an aggro list (Ancient harbinger) and it's a weird deck that people would consider trash as well without trying it. So on top of being original, this deck will keep this original state forever.
Is it a Tier 1 deck ? Most likely not, regular Zoo is better against aggro, my Zoo is better against control, and aggro rules the meta as always. Is it capable of beating Tier 1-2 decks and getting you to legend ? Yep, it's happening right now.
PS : I'm not entirely sure I understood your post (not native english), sorry if i'm completely off topic.
Two questions strike me:
1. Did you invent zoo? So its not completely original.
2. Have you proven your concept? Not that I see.
If you're not claiming your deck is completely original you're not disagreeing with my post.
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
Doesnt this happen in every TCG community? like everyone plays a trendy deck and just techs some cards in it to win mirror matches or something. I see no point in this thread
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
True netdecks evolve over a period of time, with the collective internet coming together to perfect a certain deck. That is how we got definitive lists for powerhouse decks like Patron and Secret Paladin. The innovation (aka a new deck) starts somewhere, and is then copied, refined, adjusted, copied again, etc. to the point of a near perfect list. At that point, people will tweak the netdeck according to their own preferences, meta choices, and card availability, but those are just that: tweaks.
My point is: people who think their own creative decks will ever be anywhere near as competitive as the "known" netdecks, are delusional. Do you honestly believe you, on your own, are a better deck builder than the countless of people working on a single deck put together? Sure, your own deck might be fun, and it might win some of the games some of the time, but it will never be on the same level as netdecks.
Show me a single example of a player (pro or not) who has made a "new" deck which later turned out to be the best possible version of that deck.
If you netdeck you have to endure being called a "netdecker", because that's neither a lie nor an insult but a fact. If you have a negative connotation for the word, it simply means that you know yourself that it's a lazy way out and showcases a lack of (deckbuilding) skill.
That's all there is to it.
Te be honest, "deckbuilding" is the actual skill in HS, since the game itself so easy to pilot. Give a new player a FOTM tier 1 deck, and I can assure you he can reach legend within a month. Tho, the HS card pool is limited and many decks auto-build themselves to a certain degree, so even that point is kinda moot.
What agitates me is when a FOTM netdecker face shaman BMs on top. That's prime jerk asshat behavior. That's like cheating on a test and then boasting about being "so intelligent". It's pathetic, really.
I've seen people asking for nerfs on ANYTHING. If Blizzard one day decides to actually pay attention to the community and starts nerfing as requested, we are going to have a game with only wisps. And still someone would say wisp is op. I'm not even kidding.
I don't mind net deckers. What I do mind is Hearthpwn having a list of decks on the front page, so then when I start queuing up I get to play against the same Shaman deck every other game. Please get rid of that crap.
I feel if people don't net deck they can't ever be as good as people who do. I'm not talking about getting exact decklists off the internet except more like the archtypes. If I make my own aggro shaman or my own zoo that has like 3 different cards or even like 10 different cards I still consider it a netdeck because I didn't create the archtype. I wouldn't have came up with the idea of the deck or anything it would just be a slightly different zoo. That's why I think someone who truly builds decks completely from scratch and tries to come up with new archtypes will 90% just have a bad, unrefined deck that will never be competitive. When people claim they don't netdeck, and then use tempo mage except its actually just regular tempo mage with the exception of like 4 cards you are not a deckbuilder at all.
yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I certainly believe you. I often find myself in the same position regarding professional plays/players. I am very good as well. However, I love deckbuilding and find the theorycraft aspect of the game to put me in a more edjucated position when making my desicions during plays/spectating. But making the same desicion that I would in the same hypothetical position would absolutely be possible from another strategic background. I see your point and agree with your perspective. This is not my native language.
Shd
You people need to understand that it is not possible to not plagiarize in this game to an unknown extent, because what works and what not is already there for you to find whether you check a list or not. You will eventually run into it on ladder. The original ideas you have do not make a whole deck, and even if they make a good part of the deck as in the case of when Grim Patron Warrior first appeared, it is the pro HS community that will refine it and make it a tier 1 deck. A good deck is not a one man's job, and you don't even have a good claim on your own decks because the ideas are out there already even if you don't remember seeing them. You are not completely self-aware. Maybe you have a legit claim on one idea or another but you do not have a legit claim on a whole deck and never will. That's a very silly and intellectualy immature thought.
Having said that, netdeckers are not good players.