Hearthpwn

Quote from Theraxin >>

Sadly, because the uneven length of words, it becomes like this (I even shortened with 1 character):

 

 So, sadly, this is the maximal space and character number you can fit into 2 lines.

And for Wild, I'm all for it \o/ There nothing yet that comes to my mind as not too hardly set up OTK for it, but there's a lot more class potential, like Warlock, but the best is to double innervate this at turn 5 and Living mana next turn. Okay, that might be a little too powerful. :D

 True xd, the first one is ok, try to see if are still 2 lines adding an "S" to say CrystalS, if not i think it's ok to the competition

tested and sadly, it's not, maximal character space reached. Thanks for help. :D

you can easily OTK with this on turn 10 right? play this, double innervate, then 5 mana spell that destroy mana crystals...

Phoenix: thanks for the advice! I don't know, can I modify already submitted card or not?

Rohriant: if the 5 mana card is Living mana, it destroys 1 mana per generated treant and because Syngularity has to be on board, this means up to 6 mana can be destroyed this way.

This will be my entry:

As a take on the warlocks: "this cost health instead of Mana" cards, this Shaman Card costs locked mana crystals instead of Mana. So if you have 3 locked mana crystals you can play it. the stats are similar to an Ogre Brute. My only question is: is this a fair card (stat line etc?) or am I missing something?

I'd go with a 3 mana 3|3 that says "Can cost 3 overloaded Mana Crystals." or 4 changing the numbers to 4 or just 5 mana 5|5 that can use overloaded crystals for it's cost.

My main concern is that it's a dead card most of the time, unless some crazy aggressive deck pops up and I'm already having Trogg PTSD :D

And while looking at your name and profile icon, I can see why you did it, but flavorwise an electricity or locking themed card will work better with this design, in my opinion.

Thanks for the feedback. I forgot the name already existed. It does not unlock the mana crystals btw.

I tried playing around with the text but it ended up being 3 lines every time. I also found out that locked Mana Crystals is not the right phrase, so I guess I have to make something different.

The idea is that while this card is on the board the minions that face her are turned into "statues" until she is destroyed or the positioning changes. 

Love at first sight.

Maybe change the keyword to Devour. Sounds way cooler.

I would change it to 5 worthless imps. With only 1 Augmented Elekk this would shuffle 20 worthless imps into both decks and now imagine this: you cast this with arch-villain rafaam in hand, your enemy's deck is full of imps so he basically can't draw any good cards anymore and next turn you play rafaam and dominate the game. That would be unhealthy for the game. With only 5 imps, it becomes manageable.

eat is already in the game, established precedent 

First You choose a class, that you discover a spell of that class.

You need board clearer? Choose Mag, Warlock or Warrior. You need fast minion kill? Choose Rouge. Need buff? Palladin is perfect :)

Great point!

Are we allowed to submit cards that we have have used in previous competitions?