Hearthpwn

I thought of that, and it would increase the power level of the card in Mage, and lower the Power level in Hunter. That said, it really takes the fun factor away when the beast is random, and in mage's case, it makes the card weaker than the original Polymorph. I think my best bet is one of three options. Making it only target enemies (again, makes the card less fun), bumping the cost to 4, or keeping it as is and letting the card be controversial 

*edit* I think 4 mana would successfully thwart the aggro decks while not ruining the card as that's when removal becomes more available. But it's still tempting to keep it at three. something about the low odd numbered mana cost just makes the card more appealing in my eyes. I'm really split at the moment. 

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Beyond the Dark Portal. Flavor-wise, there's a justification for this card being mage and warlock. The Dark Portal was created by the coordonated effort of Medivh [Mage] on Azeroth's side and Gul'dan [Warlock] on Draenor's side. Gameplay-wise it combines the zoo side of Warlock and the casino side of Mage. "Beyond the Dark Portal" is also the name of the add-on of Warcraft 2.

Communion (1). A pseudo-removal and/or an early-game buff for both Priest and Paladin. Combines the "set to x" mechanic of Paladin and the big health buffs of Priest. Comparable to Humility for Paladins but can sometimes be an upside.

Communion (2). Well this one is definitely more of a removal except maybe for Priest (Inner Fire).

 Bump

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Beyond the Dark Portal. Flavor-wise, there's a justification for this card being mage and warlock. The Dark Portal was created by the coordonated effort of Medivh [Mage] on Azeroth's side and Gul'dan [Warlock] on Draenor's side. Gameplay-wise it combines the zoo side of Warlock and the casino side of Mage. "Beyond the Dark Portal" is also the name of the add-on of Warcraft 2.

 

 Bump

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Beyond the Dark Portal. Flavor-wise, there's a justification for this card being mage and warlock. The Dark Portal was created by the coordonated effort of Medivh [Mage] on Azeroth's side and Gul'dan [Warlock] on Draenor's side. Gameplay-wise it combines the zoo side of Warlock and the casino side of Mage. "Beyond the Dark Portal" is also the name of the add-on of Warcraft 2..

 Bump

Quote from Toxibrah >>

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

Beyond the Dark Portal. Flavor-wise, there's a justification for this card being mage and warlock. The Dark Portal was created by the coordonated effort of Medivh [Mage] on Azeroth's side and Gul'dan [Warlock] on Draenor's side. Gameplay-wise it combines the zoo side of Warlock and the casino side of Mage. "Beyond the Dark Portal" is also the name of the add-on of Warcraft 2..

 Bump

 By definetion Beyond the Dark Portal is your best card, but like Zardoz said, it is weird that Elementals, Beasts and Pirates are streaming out amoung the other 1 drops from the Dark Portal. Furthermore the card is pretty weak. Most 1 drops has 1 health, so the card loses you the game if the opponent class has any viable Aoe.

 

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

And honestly, what would a Doppelgangster in the Firelands ??

 I actually feel like Beyond the Dark Portal is quite okay as is. As Cheese has mentioned, both Medivh and Gul'Dan open the portal which means 1 cost minions from both sides can come through, including random weenies. Besides, limiing this factor takes away the casino mage aspect which would be unfortunate. On balance, Wisps of the Old Gods isn't exactly the best comparison since it isn't played at all and when it is played it is almost only played for the buff rather than the wisps. Because of this choice given to you and the fact that most 1 drops are even then not exactly threathening, making it 7 mana wouldn't be too bad.

I also have some cards:

Stormweaver I feel has a really interesting effect with a soft taunt as this one can snowball out of control pretty quickly, especially with the combo (next turn it already is a spell damage +2 and the turn after a +5!) which can be used to good effect both in Shaman and Rogue, with the latter also having the option to apply Stealth. The balance might be hard to hit as it is rather slow.

Embalming is a buff spell that works for both Aggro Druid and Buff Paladin as they both have multiple 1 cost spells where a card like this could really help with consistency. I'm only afraid this might be too much Paladin, not enough Druid. There's also a consideration in making the draw a standalone, 1 mana spell which just draws two 1-Cost spells.

Weapon is not actually a weapon since Warlocks don't run weapons. What it is tho is a rather flavourful card with the option of turning something into a buffed demon or outright killing it. That said, it doesn't have any foreseeable practical appliance and might be hard to slot into current decks, since both classes already have good removal and don't need buffs.

Your third card is the best of the bunch. The first one is too complicated, and the second one is rather over powered, and I don't really see how it fits Druid. The only issue I have with Weapon of Choice is the name, I don't really get it. But I really like the versatility of the effect. 

Recommendation for the creator of Horrormoonculus: your card is fairly cool but also /wildly/ underpowered right now. You'd have a lot better design if the Ingreediessence tokens drew a card when used - because right now drawing one is literally just -1 card advantage if you don't draw Horrormoonculus, which means that anyone running it will run out of resources /extremely/ quickly. If the card's going to be any good, it needs to have that. (You also end up really far behind on mana, since they don't have board effects.) Overall, it's a lot of effort for something that, while it /can/ be stronger, is often going to end up as something like 10/10 across 2 bodies for 8, with some decent deathrattle - extremely strong in a vacuum, but not in this context.

An alternative to having them draw is if the Ingreediessence were more like the C'thun cards that buff C'thun, but also have other effects - but in this case, as spells instead of minions. So, for example, I Have The Might! could add a minion's attack to Horrormoonculus, then set that minion's attack to 1. We Are Many could become something like Entomb, except it transforms the minion into a Horrormoonculus. May I Get a Pet? could summon a copy immediately, etc etc. (Obviously, in this case, they would probably not all be 2 mana.) 

Just some thoughts - the core idea is rather interesting, but the expected outcome is actually really bad currently.

I have two ideas so far...

I feel like the first one is too weak and the second one is too strong. Idk. Some feedback would be nice.

Quote from Livienna >>

isnt the first one just....Brawl? or are you selecting the winner? cuz if that's the case you should have it be "Choose a minion. Destroy all others." or something :P

Quote from Mewdrops >>

Quote from Nobroam >>

I have two ideas so far...

I feel like the first one is too weak and the second one is too strong. Idk. Some feedback would be nice.

 I think I'd word Singularity as 'Choose a minion. Destroy all other ones', which I think is what you're getting at. Yeah, it is a little weak. In fact, I'd even say 8 mana would be fair, since Twisting Nether doesn't leave anything alive if you don't have a board. Anduin Lothar doesn't make sense - Enrage effects have to be passive, although I understand what you're getting at. A better wording would be 'Whenever this minion survives damage, restore it to full health.' It's definitely extremely OP as it stands (not a lot of people can deal 7 damage in one hit), so I'd maybe lower the cost and lower the health by a good amount as well.