The only real thing he is "better" than guldan is that he can be summoned by the Warlockweapon

So.. dust Lord Jaraxxus or?

dont dust any classic legendary even if they are trash so u won't get that again from a pack also jaraxxus is dumb fun card

This is tagged wild so idk about your collection. Do you have many legendaries etc? What is the chance of you opening another Jaraxxus in your packs? If this was standard related I would 100% keep because DK rotates soon out of standard leaving Jaraxxus.

Keep him, once DK rotate out, I think our Lord will fit nice into midrange warlock decks

You face Lord Jaraxxus Eredar lord of saving warlock lives since beta.

If you're wild only, I can't see Jaraxxus ever being played over Gul'Dan.

If you're standard, keep him. He bounces in and out of usefulness.

That video is pure gold

Quote from Kovachut >>

Not going to lie - every time I see a thread, where someone calls Lord Jaraxxus a bad card and wants to DE him, I get triggered.

Before the existence of Bloodreaver Gul'dan this legendary minion was a pure win-condition in many control warlock decks (almost an auto-include). If you are planning to play in standard, keep him at all cost. He is one of the good classic legendaries and he will pop up again after the rotation. Wild however might be a different topic, since Gul'dan power-creeped LJ out of existence, but even then I wouldn't DE him, since he is still a good card and a memorable character.

 2 hours late goddammit! :P

It has over 5 million views. 

Basically in short, do not dust him.

Bloodreaver is great and all but there's circumstances where LJ is more useful. With the standard rotation, he'll likely see play again in some lists.

dont forget the Sacrificial Pact Meme .... 

but still hes awesome !

Never, I repeat NEVER dust Lord Jaraxxus. Depending on wether Blizzard release another Hero card for Warlock the great Lord J will always be a part of a good Controlock Deck.

 Lord Jaraxxus was one of the first Legendary cards I unpacked and helped me really appreciate the Control side of Hearthstone. The original HandLock with Molten Giants, Ancient Watchers and Shadowflame was an absolute joy to play, and its probably my favourite deck ever. 

You would be mad to dust Lord Jaraxxus...

Yep, dust him, so you can open him again in a few months and we can have the same discussion again.

And summoning him with the weapon does not make him better with or without quotation marks.

You can discover him from a "Discover a random demon"-effect even if you dust him (not sure, if that's "better" tho). 

In context of the current meta, he may seem like a dustable, but truth is, because he is a Classic card, he will stick around when Bloodreaver Gul'dan leaves, which, to me, means you should probably keep him!

Keep him.

Don't dust him, you trifling gnome!

TRIFLING GNOME! YOUR ARROGANCE WILL BE YOUR UNDOING!!!!