I don't understand the hate for this card. You only need to draw 2 Secrets to get your mana's worth (draw two cards is worth 3 mana), and tutors are usually better than just drawing a random card. Compare this to Fight Promoter, which is more expensive, more restrictive, has no tribe tag, and still saw play in some handbuff decks.
And who cares if not all classes can use this card - there are plenty of neutral minions that are only useful for certain classes (e.g. Captain Greenskin).
Hope its not real. Wouldn’t want to pack this dude at all. He seems really bad, pack filler legendary.
Same. His effect seems very restricted, that it would be a shame if this card is legit.
Since rogue can't run all of its secrets in a single deck (they don't synergize with each other), why would the devs create a legendary for only 3 classes? I never played secret decks before, I don't plan to do it in the future, but if I get this in a pack, I would be extremely salty. The effect seems so bland - it doesn't deserve to be a legendary even if it proves being useful.
Yeah, but with the weapons it's a different story. You have 5 classes, which have some kinds of weapons in their set and in GVG Blingtron 3000 was introduced.
Dunno - my point is, that the weapons are more practical than the secrets.
The name is not official; in fact, Experiment No.9 would be better. But in WW adventure, there is a boss named as Experiment 3C. Hence I choose this name for translation.
Subject Nine exists in WoW (in the Secret Lab ... so it would fit in the Boomsday Project)
And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin, but this seems so weak as a legendary
it was also printed in hearthstone early expansions where power levels of crads were way higher then they are today
Why do people think it's bad? I mean, in a deck with a few secrets it can should at least be a 5 mana 4/4 Beast tutor for 1 (which is basically as powerful as Azure Drake), and at best, reasonably, tutor for 3 (which is more broken than pre-nerf Ancient of Lore). Obviously, it is dependent on a deck playing secrets being good, but in that deck it is stellar.
Hahaha 5 of the classess don't even have secrets and this is a neutral legendary. Man imagine playing a non-secret class because your collection is limited to them and opening this.
What is the problem for anyone to accept neutral legendary can be usable only by 4 classes? It's like that with many legionaries, just not that explicitly defined. There is just no other way how to do multi-class card that neutral. Card looks OK.
btw in past two years, I don't remember any leaked card what was the fake. All were real.
Honestly, I also wish that this shit wouldn't be real.
IF (and that's a big "if") this is true, Mage (with all those cards that like a decent hand size) will like this.
I don't understand the hate for this card. You only need to draw 2 Secrets to get your mana's worth (draw two cards is worth 3 mana), and tutors are usually better than just drawing a random card. Compare this to Fight Promoter, which is more expensive, more restrictive, has no tribe tag, and still saw play in some handbuff decks.
And who cares if not all classes can use this card - there are plenty of neutral minions that are only useful for certain classes (e.g. Captain Greenskin).
i hope i don't get this legendary in my packs lol..
That could somewhat work with Lilian Voss i guess...
Same. His effect seems very restricted, that it would be a shame if this card is legit.
Since rogue can't run all of its secrets in a single deck (they don't synergize with each other), why would the devs create a legendary for only 3 classes? I never played secret decks before, I don't plan to do it in the future, but if I get this in a pack, I would be extremely salty. The effect seems so bland - it doesn't deserve to be a legendary even if it proves being useful.
Yeah, but with the weapons it's a different story. You have 5 classes, which have some kinds of weapons in their set and in GVG Blingtron 3000 was introduced.
Dunno - my point is, that the weapons are more practical than the secrets.
Subject Nine exists in WoW (in the Secret Lab ... so it would fit in the Boomsday Project)
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Subject_Nine
In Secret Hunter, the card is insane draw power. Unprecedented actually.
The only downside is that 5 different secrets is a bit of an overkill, but Wild can help that.
I prefer other legendaries, but i wouldn't mind dropping this guy.
it was also printed in hearthstone early expansions where power levels of crads were way higher then they are today
Why do people think it's bad? I mean, in a deck with a few secrets it can should at least be a 5 mana 4/4 Beast tutor for 1 (which is basically as powerful as Azure Drake), and at best, reasonably, tutor for 3 (which is more broken than pre-nerf Ancient of Lore). Obviously, it is dependent on a deck playing secrets being good, but in that deck it is stellar.
This card can be good in a Hand Mage deck but the fact that it is a legendary really makes the draw inconsistent.
.
I reaaaaaly hope I would not get this one as preorder golden (assuming it's real).
I don’t believe that a neutral Legendary wouldn’t be useable by all classes. Probably a fake imo.
Hahaha 5 of the classess don't even have secrets and this is a neutral legendary. Man imagine playing a non-secret class because your collection is limited to them and opening this.
Captain Greenskin existed before Kobolds and Catacombs.
This could definitely be real.
What is the problem for anyone to accept neutral legendary can be usable only by 4 classes? It's like that with many legionaries, just not that explicitly defined. There is just no other way how to do multi-class card that neutral. Card looks OK.
btw in past two years, I don't remember any leaked card what was the fake. All were real.
Why are people saying a 5 mana 4/4 "Draw 5 cards" is bad? Are you guys crazy???
Gadgetzan tri-class cards for example?