As I mentioned, I have golden hunter. I have played enough hunter to see that this deck is good enough for low ranks, but nothing more.
I couldn't care less if you think I have a master's degree or not. I do have one, which implies that I have a good understanding of physics, math and stress analysis. But no, I do not have the deck-building skills that Savjz or Thijs have. Neither do you.
And yes, my decks in my deck area are utter shite. I know that. I The only deck I played enough to recommend was the Renolock - and I played it to legend (and I made it straight after LoE got released, so it wasn't a net decked renolock).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
As I mentioned, I have golden hunter. I have played enough hunter to see that this deck is good enough for low ranks, but nothing more.
I couldn't care less if you think I have a master's degree or not. I do have one, which implies that I have a good understanding of physics, math and stress analysis. But no, I do not have the deck-building skills that Savjz or Thijs have. Neither do you.
And yes, my decks in my deck area are utter shite. I know that. I The only deck I played enough to recommend was the Renolock - and I played it to legend (and I made it straight after LoE got released, so it wasn't a net decked renolock).
still pushing that epeen. Doesn't matter. if your win rate is over 50% you can get to legend with anything. But you still lack any understanding of why this thread exists in the first place. its not to push that I'm master of all things hunter and deck building. Its to craft with fellow players a hunter deck that can be played in the meta and still succeed which this deck does. whether its legend material or not is irelevant. If anything, the fact most matches are 5-8 minutes long instead of 10-15 stands as a reason why you'd use this on ladder to get to legend. faster games, good win rate and match ups against popular decks, fun to play when you actually understand it... go dust off your hunter cards man if you're so good and make a playable deck yourself, or copy this and be enlightened...
If you believe this is a good deck, continue to play it. But stop calling someone else a liar, stupid and bad in deck building if you can't do it yourself.
Grow up, have some introspection, be critical to your own decks, and listen to other people.
If you believe this is a good deck, continue to play it. But stop calling someone else a liar, stupid and bad in deck building if you can't do it yourself.
Grow up, have some introspection, be critical to your own decks, and listen to other people.
Thank you, and good bye.
I'm out of here.
First off, 5 games is nothing, second off you didn't post the decks you played against, 3rd you can't expect to win with a deck you don't understand. Its not a brainless pirate warrior deck like i'm sure you're treating it.
you had coin mulligan and it looks like you were greedy with not sending back more things to ensure secrets for huntress. you probably kept barnes and huntress in your hand at least and possibly that kill command or you whiffed your mulligan and tried to barnes with a ratio of 2 alley cat to about 6 death rattle months 1/3 chance to whiff your barnes and you still went for it.... greedy
I still fail to see how it's preferable to have so many 5+ drops in secrets hunter. How is this better than just playing aggro secrets, which has much better synergy with the main thrust of the deck.
I still fail to see how it's preferable to have so many 5+ drops in secrets hunter. How is this better than just playing aggro secrets, which has much better synergy with the main thrust of the deck.
Because this version has less bad match ups. I've refined this deck to only have bad matchups against a small portion of the meta. Jade druid is prominent right now and this deck is much more successful against it and most Reno decks unlike secret hunter aggro which burns out vs Reno and shaman
I still fail to see how it's preferable to have so many 5+ drops in secrets hunter. How is this better than just playing aggro secrets, which has much better synergy with the main thrust of the deck.
Because this version has less bad match ups. I've refined this deck to only had bad matchups against a small portion of the meta. Jade druid is prominent right now and this deck is much more successful against it and most Reno decks unlike secret hunter aggro which burns out vs Reno and shaman
You run one 1 drop and 2 2 drops. You even say to hold the 1 drop for a t6 combo. You are turning a 45% match-up vs aggro to a 15% match-up.
you spend t6 drawing cards (but theres no burn to draw into) instead of killing a Reno before heal. You're never going to out value a Reno with this deck, even if you draw 2 cards a turn from t5 on.
you clearly don't know how to play aggro secret hunter correctly, so how can you reasonably compare the matchups of that deck to yours.
If you believe this is a good deck, continue to play it. But stop calling someone else a liar, stupid and bad in deck building if you can't do it yourself.
Grow up, have some introspection, be critical to your own decks, and listen to other people.
Thank you, and good bye.
I'm out of here.
First off, 5 games is nothing, second off you didn't post the decks you played against, 3rd you can't expect to win with a deck you don't understand. Its not a brainless pirate warrior deck like i'm sure you're treating it.
you had coin mulligan and it looks like you were greedy with not sending back more things to ensure secrets for huntress. you probably kept barnes and huntress in your hand at least and possibly that kill command or you whiffed your mulligan and tried to barnes with a ratio of 2 alley cat to about 6 death rattle months 1/3 chance to whiff your barnes and you still went for it.... greedy
Oh my god. Why are you so salty? I would have played more if I would've won more games. I played against midrange shaman, aggro paladin, zoo (which was the game I won), face hunter and another shaman (Where were the most dominating deck on ladder right now (Jade Druid) ? )
As I also have mentioned 2 times before ( and you can see it on the picture I attached), that I have golden hunter, and assuming I only know pirate warrior is false. I know how to play Hunter, and hunter is really, really bad right now.
I tried to hard mulligan for early drops (grandmother and alleycat) to get some tempo in play, and not get behind on board, but I failed 4 of the 5 games I played. You can't see what I mulliganed for, so stop accusing me for doing bad plays.
Get a grip son and grow up. Stop with the accusations, and stop being salty on all the people who tries to advice you and ask you questions.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
Violets are blue, roses are not.. Interventions are bad, sometimes are not!
Not only has the thread went south, but also has become poisonous with personal attacks.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
You can't harass members who play Face Hunter, nor are they compelled to make preemptive apologies or justifications for playing it. They don't hack or crack their opponents' game, they simply play existing cards that form a specific deck. If you suck at countering Face Hunter, you should blame the designers, not the community.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
As I mentioned, I have golden hunter. I have played enough hunter to see that this deck is good enough for low ranks, but nothing more.
I couldn't care less if you think I have a master's degree or not. I do have one, which implies that I have a good understanding of physics, math and stress analysis. But no, I do not have the deck-building skills that Savjz or Thijs have. Neither do you.
And yes, my decks in my deck area are utter shite. I know that. I The only deck I played enough to recommend was the Renolock - and I played it to legend (and I made it straight after LoE got released, so it wasn't a net decked renolock).
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
I'm not trying to impress you with my epeen, it's a fact.
Anyhow, I did try your deck, and in my first game, I met a midrange shaman. Then this happened:
I'm not even kidding. First game.
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
Played 5 games. Went 1-4.
If you believe this is a good deck, continue to play it. But stop calling someone else a liar, stupid and bad at the game if you can't do it yourself.
Grow up, have some introspection, be critical to your own decks, and listen to other people.
Thank you, and good bye.
I'm out of here.
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
Played 5 games. Went 1-4.
If you believe this is a good deck, continue to play it. But stop calling someone else a liar, stupid and bad in deck building if you can't do it yourself.
Grow up, have some introspection, be critical to your own decks, and listen to other people.
Thank you, and good bye.
I'm out of here.
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
I still fail to see how it's preferable to have so many 5+ drops in secrets hunter. How is this better than just playing aggro secrets, which has much better synergy with the main thrust of the deck.
This is not aggro secret hunter. Stop commenting, you literally are clueless....
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
Everything that isn't about elephants is irrelephant.
Thread closed.
Violets are blue, roses are not..
Interventions are bad, sometimes are not!
Not only has the thread went south, but also has become poisonous with personal attacks.
You can't harass members who play Face Hunter, nor are they compelled to make preemptive apologies or justifications for playing it. They don't hack or crack their opponents' game, they simply play existing cards that form a specific deck. If you suck at countering Face Hunter, you should blame the designers, not the community.