Hearthpwn

That would be an interesting addition. I feel it may be too unreliable. If I were to put it in I would most likely substitute out 1 Harvest Golem.

If you try this please let me know how this works for you!

Awesome deck dude! :)

Thank You For Checking it out!

Two things -

1. Would it be okay to replace TBK with Sylvanas?

2. Is there anything to replace dark wipsers? (I only have one FoN)

I use TBK to get over big walls do to this decks lack of removal. Sylvannas would be the closest substitution I suppose but her effect is not an instant or guaranteed swing in tempo. None the less, she is a fine replacement if you don't have TBK.

As for Dark Whispers, This card plays a very unique roll in this deck. Either choice on this card has a time and a place, so replacing it is not easy. I would either replace it with FoN (which you only have 1 of) or possibly a Zombie chow (seems odd huh?).

although i would add wild growths somewhere in there

I thought long and hard about that, but I could not decide what to remove. This is not a super late game value druid so the wild growth would lose value in that sense. It does have synergy with violet teacher, but ideally wild growth is played on turn 2 any way (before Violet Teacher). 

but it would allow you to play your whisps sooner, not to mention those bigger ancient of lores, the thing is you would need to add 2 to make them worth while. If anything i'd trade them in for -1 drake and -1wrath :l

Often times there are multiple tokens, sticky minions already on board and I use Dark Whispers as a 5/5 charge with the buff. But your point stands as it is a 6 mana spell technically. I feel innervate provides a necessary amount of ramp as the mana curve for this deck averages at about 4 (possibly less than that due to innervates), making wild growths slightly unnecessary in my opinion, but I will attempt to include them and pass on my findings.

defintely will be trying this deck out! thanks